Results 231 to 240 of about 1,145,196 (283)

CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Micro‐CSR Perspective

open access: yesCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Although research on micro‐level CSR has increasingly emphasized individual‐level antecedents, the role of CEO overconfidence has not been systematically integrated into the literature. To address this gap, a systematic literature review was undertaken of 62 studies on CEO overconfidence and CSR, revealing a mixed picture of positive, negative,
Jannis Kreinhop
wiley   +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Moral Judgments

Annual Review of Psychology, 2021
Research on morality has increased rapidly over the past 10 years. At the center of this research are moral judgments—evaluative judgments that a perceiver makes in response to a moral norm violation. But there is substantial diversity in what has been called moral judgment.
openaire   +2 more sources

Emotion and moral judgment

WIREs Cognitive Science, 2013
AbstractResearch in psychology and cognitive science has consistently demonstrated the importance of emotion in a wide range of everyday judgments, including moral judgment. Most current accounts of moral judgment hold that emotion plays an important role, but the nature and extent of this role are still debated.
Avramova, Y.R., Inbar, Y.
openaire   +3 more sources

Moral Judgment

2019
Link_to_subscribed_fulltext
Kelly, Daniel   +2 more
openaire   +3 more sources

MORAL JUDGMENT

Pediatrics, 1978
What a man calls moral judgment is merely his desire to generalize, and so make available for others, those values he has come to choose.
Avner Ziv, David Green, Joseph Guttman
openaire   +2 more sources

Moral Judgment

2023
AbstractShould we trust our gut feelings in ethics and politics? Psychopaths’ brain abnormalities dampen moral feelings like compassion and remorse, which might suggest that emotions are generally good moral guides. However, both typical and atypical brains suggest that rational and emotional capacities are entangled.
openaire   +2 more sources

The Origins of Moral Judgment

Behaviour, 2014
Is human morality a biological adaptation? And, if so, should this fact have any substantial impact on the ethical inquiry of how we should live our lives? In this paper I will address both these questions, though will not attempt definitively to answer either.
openaire   +1 more source

Action Trees and Moral Judgment

Topics in Cognitive Science, 2010
It has sometimes been suggested that people represent the structure of action in terms of an action tree. A question now arises about the relationship between this action tree representation and people's moral judgments. A natural hypothesis would be that people first construct a representation of the action tree and then go on to use this ...
openaire   +3 more sources

Moral Judgment

2014
Legal judgments must be influenced by how people think about good and evil, right and wrong. This chapter reviews some of the history of the psychology of moral judgment, and the methods used to study it. It suggests the use of utilitarianism as a normative model for evaluating judgments, if only because departures from utilitarian judgments could have
  +4 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy