Results 271 to 280 of about 1,681,264 (334)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
WIREs Cognitive Science, 2013
AbstractResearch in psychology and cognitive science has consistently demonstrated the importance of emotion in a wide range of everyday judgments, including moral judgment. Most current accounts of moral judgment hold that emotion plays an important role, but the nature and extent of this role are still debated.
Avramova, Y.R., Inbar, Y.
openaire +3 more sources
AbstractResearch in psychology and cognitive science has consistently demonstrated the importance of emotion in a wide range of everyday judgments, including moral judgment. Most current accounts of moral judgment hold that emotion plays an important role, but the nature and extent of this role are still debated.
Avramova, Y.R., Inbar, Y.
openaire +3 more sources
Internet trolling and everyday sadism: Parallel effects on pain perception and moral judgment.
Journal of Personality, 2018OBJECTIVE This research seeks to clarify the association between online trolling and sadistic personality, and to provide evidence that the reward and rationalization processes at work in sadism are likewise manifest in online trolling.
Erin E. Buckels +3 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1978
Four hundred fifty-four preadolescents from seventh and eighth grades in three subcultures-city, kibbutz, and Israeli Arabs-were compared on the realistic-relativistic dimension of moral judgment. City children were more relativistic in their judgment than both kibbutz children and Israeli Arabs, who were similar in their scores.
Avner Ziv, David Green, Joseph Guttman
openaire +2 more sources
Four hundred fifty-four preadolescents from seventh and eighth grades in three subcultures-city, kibbutz, and Israeli Arabs-were compared on the realistic-relativistic dimension of moral judgment. City children were more relativistic in their judgment than both kibbutz children and Israeli Arabs, who were similar in their scores.
Avner Ziv, David Green, Joseph Guttman
openaire +2 more sources
Behaviour, 2014
Is human morality a biological adaptation? And, if so, should this fact have any substantial impact on the ethical inquiry of how we should live our lives? In this paper I will address both these questions, though will not attempt definitively to answer either.
openaire +1 more source
Is human morality a biological adaptation? And, if so, should this fact have any substantial impact on the ethical inquiry of how we should live our lives? In this paper I will address both these questions, though will not attempt definitively to answer either.
openaire +1 more source
Social metacognition in moral judgment: Decisional conflict promotes perspective taking.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2019A series of studies explored people's metacognition about moral judgments. These studies begin by demonstrating a metacognitive asymmetry: When faced with a dilemma, consequentialist responders tend to feel more conflict than deontological responders ...
André Mata
semanticscholar +1 more source
Wrongness in different relationships: Relational context effects on moral judgment
Journal of Social Psychology, 2016 Ain Simpson +2 more
exaly +2 more sources
2023
AbstractShould we trust our gut feelings in ethics and politics? Psychopaths’ brain abnormalities dampen moral feelings like compassion and remorse, which might suggest that emotions are generally good moral guides. However, both typical and atypical brains suggest that rational and emotional capacities are entangled.
openaire +2 more sources
AbstractShould we trust our gut feelings in ethics and politics? Psychopaths’ brain abnormalities dampen moral feelings like compassion and remorse, which might suggest that emotions are generally good moral guides. However, both typical and atypical brains suggest that rational and emotional capacities are entangled.
openaire +2 more sources
The Role of Emotion Regulation in Moral Judgment
Neuroethics, 2016 Moral judgment has typically been characterized as a conflict between emotion and reason. In recent years, a central concern has been determining which process is the chief contributor to moral behavior.
Chelsea Helion
exaly +2 more sources
2014
Legal judgments must be influenced by how people think about good and evil, right and wrong. This chapter reviews some of the history of the psychology of moral judgment, and the methods used to study it. It suggests the use of utilitarianism as a normative model for evaluating judgments, if only because departures from utilitarian judgments could have
+4 more sources
Legal judgments must be influenced by how people think about good and evil, right and wrong. This chapter reviews some of the history of the psychology of moral judgment, and the methods used to study it. It suggests the use of utilitarianism as a normative model for evaluating judgments, if only because departures from utilitarian judgments could have
+4 more sources
Ethical judgment, subjective norms, and ethical consumption: The moderating role of moral certainty
, 2020Although various empirical works have attempted to explain the gap between consumers' ethical judgments and actual purchasing behaviours, the role of moral certainty has received relatively little attention. Moral certainty refers to the subjective sense
Abdallah Alsaad
semanticscholar +1 more source