Results 251 to 260 of about 1,058,703 (292)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2014
Legal judgments must be influenced by how people think about good and evil, right and wrong. This chapter reviews some of the history of the psychology of moral judgment, and the methods used to study it. It suggests the use of utilitarianism as a normative model for evaluating judgments, if only because departures from utilitarian judgments could have
+4 more sources
Legal judgments must be influenced by how people think about good and evil, right and wrong. This chapter reviews some of the history of the psychology of moral judgment, and the methods used to study it. It suggests the use of utilitarianism as a normative model for evaluating judgments, if only because departures from utilitarian judgments could have
+4 more sources
2019
Abstract Scrupulous moral judgments vary from moral judgments made by those without Scrupulosity. The content of Scrupulous moral judgments are perfectionist, which conflates what is ideal with what is obligatory, conflates the moral evaluation of thoughts and actions, and is influenced by chronic doubt and intolerance of uncertainty ...
Jesse S. Summers +1 more
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Scrupulous moral judgments vary from moral judgments made by those without Scrupulosity. The content of Scrupulous moral judgments are perfectionist, which conflates what is ideal with what is obligatory, conflates the moral evaluation of thoughts and actions, and is influenced by chronic doubt and intolerance of uncertainty ...
Jesse S. Summers +1 more
openaire +1 more source
1998
Abstract As shown in the first chapter, all previous accounts of moral judgments are inadequate because they provide no clear distinction between moral and nonmoral judgments. These linguistic or metaethical accounts are unable to provide a clear distinction because they are primarily theories about the purposes of making moral judgments,
openaire +1 more source
Abstract As shown in the first chapter, all previous accounts of moral judgments are inadequate because they provide no clear distinction between moral and nonmoral judgments. These linguistic or metaethical accounts are unable to provide a clear distinction because they are primarily theories about the purposes of making moral judgments,
openaire +1 more source
To understand human moral judgment is daunting, but it is also vitally important. Because people disagree about morals, mapping the structure and function of morals can help us to understand, and perhaps avoid, those disagreements ... By understanding the hidden logic of our moral minds, we can better appreciate a foundational part of our humanity.
openaire +2 more sources
openaire +2 more sources
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1981
In order to determine when ethical ideology influences judgments of morality, individuals who endorsed an absolutist, exceptionist, subjectivist, or situationist ideology morally evaluated an actor linked, at varying levels of responsibility, to positive or negative outcomes.
openaire +1 more source
In order to determine when ethical ideology influences judgments of morality, individuals who endorsed an absolutist, exceptionist, subjectivist, or situationist ideology morally evaluated an actor linked, at varying levels of responsibility, to positive or negative outcomes.
openaire +1 more source
Moral Judgment as Categorization (MJAC)
Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2022Eric R Igou +2 more
exaly
THE MORAL JUDGMENT OF SCHIZOPHRENICS
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1960openaire +2 more sources
How (and where) does moral judgment work?
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2002Jonathan Haidt, Joshua Greene
exaly