Results 121 to 130 of about 2,822 (168)
Nagarjuna's Conception of Womanhood
JOURNAL OF INDIAN AND BUDDHIST STUDIES (INDOGAKU BUKKYOGAKU KENKYU), 1975 openaire +2 more sources
Nagarjuna's View on ‘Pratityasamutpada’
JOURNAL OF INDIAN AND BUDDHIST STUDIES (INDOGAKU BUKKYOGAKU KENKYU), 1971 openaire +2 more sources
The Problem of Sraddha or Faith in Nagarjuna
JOURNAL OF INDIAN AND BUDDHIST STUDIES (INDOGAKU BUKKYOGAKU KENKYU), 1955 openaire +2 more sources
On the Astamahasthanacaityastotra Attributed to Nagarjuna
Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu), 2007 openaire +2 more sources
‘Snakes and Ladders’ – ‘Therapy’ as Liberation in Nagarjuna and Wittgenstein’s Tractatus [PDF]
Sophia, 2021 This paper reconsiders the notion that Nagarjuna and Wittgenstein’s Tractatus may only be seen as comparable under a shared ineffability thesis, that is, the idea that reality is impossible to describe in sensible discourse.
Joshua Smith
exaly +2 more sources
Religion and Theology, 1997 AbstractThis article tracks further the deconstructive path of thought of the Buddhist thinker Nagarjuna as reflected in his major text, the MŪtamadhyamakakrika. This text, inspired by Prajnaparamita intertexts, aims mainly at the deconstruction of earlier Abhidharma metaphysics.
Charl Ie Roux
openaire +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Cognitive Scepticism of Nagarjuna
1998This paper aims at a critical exposition of some arguments by Nagarjuna against the cognitivist claims of the Nyaya philosophers, and a possible cognitivist critique of the skeptical arguments of Nagarjuna. My argument is presented in two broad sections.
exaly +2 more sources
2022
Buddha’s austere dualism of mental atoms and physical atoms is not austere enough for idealist disciples. They ground all of reality on ideas. The budget is further cut by Nagarjuna, who questions the presupposition that there is a fundamental level of being. He sees no inconsistency in a universe that is divisible without limit.
openaire +1 more source
Buddha’s austere dualism of mental atoms and physical atoms is not austere enough for idealist disciples. They ground all of reality on ideas. The budget is further cut by Nagarjuna, who questions the presupposition that there is a fundamental level of being. He sees no inconsistency in a universe that is divisible without limit.
openaire +1 more source