Results 121 to 130 of about 1,163 (145)
A Utilitarian Perspective on Risk Quantification for Clinical Significance in Binary Outcomes. [PDF]
InquiryPark J.
europepmc +1 more source
Assessing Agreement of Intraocular Pressure from Four Mechanistically Different Tonometers in the Eye Dynamics and Engineering Network Clinical Trial. [PDF]
Ophthalmol GlaucomaLiu M +7 more
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
American Psychologist, 2002
Krueger’s (January 2001) thesis can be summarized as follows: Induction is central to science (true). From a philosophical perspective, induction cannot be defended logically but can be defended pragmatically— because it leads to progress in science (true).
Frank, Schmidt, John, Hunter
exaly +5 more sources
Krueger’s (January 2001) thesis can be summarized as follows: Induction is central to science (true). From a philosophical perspective, induction cannot be defended logically but can be defended pragmatically— because it leads to progress in science (true).
Frank, Schmidt, John, Hunter
exaly +5 more sources
Problems With Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST): What Do the Textbooks Say?
Journal of Experimental Education, 2002The first of 3 objectives in this study was to address the major problem with Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST) and 2 common misconceptions related to NHST that cause confusion for students and researchers. The misconcep- tions are (a) a smaller p indicates a stronger relationship and (b) statistical signifi- cance indicates practical ...
Nancy L Leech, George A Morgan
exaly +2 more sources
Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 2016
ABSTRACT Purpose: This article describes and explains the arrival of the current tipping-point in shifting from bad-to-good science. This article identifies Hubbard (2016a) as a major troublemaker in attacking the current dominant logic supporting bad science, that is, null hypothesis statistical testing (NHST) in management science.Focus: Crossing the
Arch G Woodside
exaly +3 more sources
ABSTRACT Purpose: This article describes and explains the arrival of the current tipping-point in shifting from bad-to-good science. This article identifies Hubbard (2016a) as a major troublemaker in attacking the current dominant logic supporting bad science, that is, null hypothesis statistical testing (NHST) in management science.Focus: Crossing the
Arch G Woodside
exaly +3 more sources
The Lack of Reproducibility in Management Accounting Research: Blame It All on the NHST?
Advances in Management AccountingLindsay has written an extensive, erudite, and thought-provoking piece on the dominant use of null-hypothesis significance testing (NHST) in management accounting research. He blames the research community’s excessive reliance on NHST for producing irreproducible findings.
Hartmann, F.G.H., Niederkofler, N.T.
exaly +3 more sources
Is NHST logically flawed? Commentary on: “NHST is still logically flawed”
Scientometrics, 2018Alexandre G Patriota
exaly +2 more sources
Role of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST) in the Design of Neuropsychologic Research
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 1998Domenic V Cicchetti
exaly +3 more sources