Results 41 to 50 of about 28,060 (225)
Noetherian and Artinian ordered groupoids—semigroups
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, 2005 Chain conditions, finiteness conditions, growth conditions, and other forms of finiteness, Noetherian rings and Artinian rings have been systematically studied for commutative rings and algebras since 1959.
Niovi Kehayopulu, Michael Tsingelis
doaj +1 more source
Counting submodules of a module over a noetherian commutative ring
, 2019 We count the number of submodules of an arbitrary module over a countable noetherian commutative ring. We give, along the way, a structural description of meager modules, which are defined as those that do not have the square of a simple module as ...
Cornulier, Yves
core +2 more sources
Local equivalence and refinements of Rasmussen's s‐invariant
Journal of Topology, Volume 19, Issue 1, March 2026.Abstract Inspired by the notions of local equivalence in monopole and Heegaard Floer homology, we introduce a version of local equivalence that combines odd Khovanov homology with equivariant even Khovanov homology into an algebraic package called a local even–odd (LEO) triple.
Nathan M. Dunfield +2 more
wiley +1 more source
On nonnil-S-Noetherian and nonnil-u-S-Noetherian rings
Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii Ovidius Constanta: Seria MatematicaLet R be a commutative ring with identity, and let S be a multiplicative subset of R. Then R is called a nonnil-S-Noetherian ring if every nonnil ideal of R is S-finite.
Mahdou Najib +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Splitting the difference: Computations of the Reynolds operator in classical invariant theory
Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, Volume 58, Issue 1, January 2026.Abstract If G$G$ is a linearly reductive group acting rationally on a polynomial ring S$S$, then the inclusion SG↪S$S^{G} \hookrightarrow S$ possesses a unique G$G$‐equivariant splitting, called the Reynolds operator. We describe algorithms for computing the Reynolds operator for the classical actions as in Weyl's book.
Aryaman Maithani
wiley +1 more source
Fuzzy k-Primary Decomposition of Fuzzy k-Ideal in a Semiring
Fuzzy Information and Engineering, 2015 In this paper, we establish that the Lasker–Noether theorem for a commutative ring may be generalized for a commutative semiring. We produce an example of an ideal in a Noetherian semiring which cannot be expressed as finite intersection of primary ...
S. Kar, S. Purkait, B. Davvaz
doaj +1 more source
When do pseudo‐Gorenstein rings become Gorenstein?
Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, Volume 58, Issue 1, January 2026.Abstract We discuss the relationship between the trace ideal of the canonical module and pseudo‐Gorensteinness. In particular, under certain mild assumptions, we show that every positively graded domain that is both pseudo‐Gorenstein and nearly Gorenstein is Gorenstein. As an application, we clarify the relationships among nearly Gorensteinness, almost
Sora Miyashita
wiley +1 more source
Bi-artinian noetherian rings [PDF]
Glasgow Mathematical Journal, 2001 A noetherian ring R satisfies the descending chain condition on two-sided ideals (“is bi-artinian”) if and only if, for each prime P ∈ spec(R), R/P has a unique minimal ideal (necessarily idempotent and left-right essential in R/P). The analogous statement for merely right noetherian rings is false, although our proof does not use the full ...
openaire +2 more sources
The log Grothendieck ring of varieties
Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, Volume 58, Issue 1, January 2026.Abstract We define a Grothendieck ring of varieties for log schemes. It is generated by one additional class “P$P$” over the usual Grothendieck ring. We show the naïve definition of log Hodge numbers does not make sense for all log schemes. We offer an alternative that does.
Andreas Gross +4 more
wiley +1 more source
Torsion classes of extended Dynkin quivers over commutative rings
Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, Volume 58, Issue 1, January 2026.Abstract For a Noetherian R$R$‐algebra Λ$\Lambda$, there is a canonical inclusion torsΛ→∏p∈SpecRtors(κ(p)Λ)$\mathop {\mathsf {tors}}\Lambda \rightarrow \prod _{\mathfrak {p}\in \operatorname{Spec}R}\mathop {\mathsf {tors}}(\kappa (\mathfrak {p})\Lambda)$, and each element in the image satisfies a certain compatibility condition.
Osamu Iyama, Yuta Kimura
wiley +1 more source