Results 181 to 190 of about 9,893,580 (222)

Non-cognitivism and rational inference

Philosophical Studies, 2009
Non-cognitivism might seem to offer a plausible account of evaluative judgments, at least on the assumption that there is a satisfactory solution to the Frege–Geach problem. However, Cian Dorr has argued that non-cognitivism remains implausible even assuming that the Frege–Geach problem can be solved, on the grounds that non-cognitivism still has to ...
Mark B. Budolfson
openaire   +2 more sources

Non-cognitivism and Motivation

2009
It is usually thought, following Hume, that considerations to do with motivation favour non-cognitivism over cognitivism about moral judgements. Hume’s motivation argument was that non-cognitivism does better than cognitivism at respecting the common observation that there is an immediate or internal connection between moral judgements and motivation ...
Nick Zangwill
openaire   +2 more sources

Wittgenstein’s ‘Non-Cognitivism’ – Explained and Vindicated

Synthese, 2007
The later Wittgenstein advanced a revolutionary but puzzling conception of how philosophy ought to be practised: Philosophical problems are not to be coped with by establishing substantive claims or devising explanations or theories. Instead, philosophical questions ought to be treated 'like an illness'.
E. Fischer
openaire   +3 more sources

Rule-Following, Moral Realism and Non-Cognitivism Revisited

Ethics in the Wake of Wittgenstein, 2019
Thirty-seven or so years ago, John McDowell and Simon Blackburn had a classic exchange in which they discussed the significance of the later Wittgenstein’s writings on following a rule for the debate in meta-ethics between moral realism and non-cognitivism. Building on previous work (Contemporary Metaethics: An Introduction, second edition, Chapter 10),
Alexander Miller
openaire   +2 more sources

Cognitivism and Non-Cognitivism Approaches in Legal Realm

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015
Cognitivists believe that morality is the standard of evaluation whereas non-cognitivists believe that the matters of morality are highly metaphysical and such issues cannot be either established true or erroneous. Cognitivism is central theme of value, evaluation and judgment based on certain standard whereas non-cognitivism is science that seeks ...
Suman Acharya
openaire   +2 more sources

If Not Non-Cognitivism, Then What?

2009
According to Michael Smith, the big issue in metaethics (what he calls “The Moral Problem”) is how to accept the seemingly true premises of Hume’s Motivation Argument while fending off its non-cognitivist conclusion, a conclusion that Smith takes to be both repugnant and false (Smith, 1994, The Moral Problem, henceforward MP).
C. Pigden
openaire   +2 more sources

Cognitivism/Non-Cognitivism and Motivational Judgment Internalism/Externalism

The Psychological Basis of Moral Judgments, 2021
J. Park
openaire   +2 more sources

Cognitivism and Non-Cognitivism

2017
Matthew S. Bedke
openaire   +2 more sources

Is Descartes’ philosophy of emotions non-cognitivism?

Modern Philosophy, 2018
Jaehwan Lee
openaire   +2 more sources

Literary cognitivism, anti-cognitivism and non-cognitivism

2020
J. Phelan
openaire   +2 more sources