Results 221 to 230 of about 15,755 (254)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

How ‘non-invasive’ is non-invasive prenatal testing?

Journal of Medical Ethics
The invasiveness of a medical intervention is considered to be morally important and can have a significant influence on acceptability and uptake. De Marco et al propose a novel account of the invasiveness of medical interventions that better reflects the common understanding of the term ...
openaire   +2 more sources

Current status of non‐invasive prenatal testing in Japan

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 2017
AbstractAimThe purpose of this study was to report the 3‐year experience of a nationwide demonstration project to introduce non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) of maternal plasma for aneuploidy, and review the current status of NIPT in Japan.MethodsTests were conducted to detect aneuploidy in high‐risk pregnant women, and adequate genetic counseling ...
Osamu Samura   +55 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Ethics and Policy Considerations

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 2014
New technologies analyzing fetal DNA in maternal blood have led to the wide commercial availability of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). We present here for clinicians the ethical and policy issues related to an emerging practice option. Although NIPT presents opportunities for pregnant women, particularly women who are at increased risk of having ...
Meredith, Vanstone   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Non-invasive prenatal testing.

Australian family physician, 2018
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), also known as cell-free DNA testing and non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS), is an important addition to the range of screening tests for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. For trisomy 21 in particular, NIPT is superior to other screening modalities.
openaire   +1 more source

Non-invasive prenatal testing as a routine procedure of prenatal care

Ethik in der Medizin, 2019
In March 2019, the German Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (G‑BA; Federal Joint Committee) presented the result of the method assessment process on non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). The aim of this method assessment process was to decide whether NIPT should become a publicly funded procedure of routine prenatal care.
Giovanni Rubeis   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

[Non-invasive prenatal testing is a breakthrough in prenatal screening].

Ugeskrift for laeger, 2017
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free fetal DNA from the peripheral blood of the pregnant woman has become a possibility within recent years, but is not yet implemented in Denmark. NIPT has proven to be very efficient in the screening for especially trisomi 21.
Louise Stig, Hornstrup   +3 more
openaire   +1 more source

Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)

2022
Nuria Balaguer   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Non‐invasive prenatal testing: what are we missing?

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021
N. Fries   +7 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Non invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for common aneuploidies and beyond

European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2021
exaly  

Experiences of non‐invasive prenatal screening: A survey study

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2022
Taylah Armstrong   +2 more
exaly  

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy