Results 171 to 180 of about 8,376 (207)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Medical Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, and Patients’ Well-Being
The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 2022This article critically analyzes the principle of beneficence and the principle of nonmaleficence in clinical medical ethics. It resists some recent skepticism about the principle of nonmaleficence, and then seeks to explain its role in medicine. The article proposes that the two principles are informed by different accounts of what is in the patient's
openaire +2 more sources
Navigating the Ethical Path: Nonmaleficence and Cultural Humility in Psychotherapy
Journal of Systemic Therapies, 2023In this article we explore integrating diversity, equity, inclusivity (DEI), intersectionality, and cultural humility into psychotherapy, guided by the ethical principle of nonmaleficence—the commitment to do no harm. We critique the limitations of traditional Eurocentric psychotherapy and advocate for DEI principles to better address the diverse ...
Deone Curling +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Nonmaleficence and Hope: a Correlation
Pastoral Psychology, 2020This essay is an application of a method of inquiry described in Nathan Carlin’s 2019 book Pastoral Aesthetics. In Pastoral Aesthetics, Carlin correlates four principles of bioethics with four images of pastoral care to provide new perspectives on these principles by offering inquiry that is theologically informed, psychologically sophisticated ...
openaire +1 more source
Nonmaleficence, Nondisclosure, and Nocebo: Response to Open Peer Commentaries
The American Journal of Bioethics, 2017In our target article, “When Respecting Autonomy Is Harmful: A Clinically Relevant Approach to the Nocebo Effect,” we advocate for selective nondisclosure of medication-related side effects based o...
John T. Fortunato +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Nonmaleficence in Shaming: The Ethical Dilemma Underlying Participation in Online Public Shaming
Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2021We show that a decision of potential shamers to take part in (“share” and “retweet”) an online shaming campaign against alleged wrongdoers is shaped by two factors: the potential shamer’s level of adherence to the nonmaleficence principle (i.e., do no harm) and the wrongdoer identifiability (the extent to which a wrongdoer’s details are exposed).
Chen Pundak +2 more
openaire +1 more source

