Results 181 to 190 of about 7,160 (223)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
The odontoid process in children — is it hypoplastic?
Clinical Radiology, 1988An analysis of the cervical spine of 508 normal children aged between 3 and 18.9 years provided data for the normal development of the odontoid process and its relationship to the anterior arch of the atlas. In normal children under the age of 9 years, the tip of the odontoid may fall well short of the upper margin of the anterior arch of the atlas ...
openaire +2 more sources
2020
The odontoid process was once thought to be a displaced body of the atlas but is now believed to have separated from the anterior part of the atlas between the sixth and seventh week of gestation and to have migrated caudally to fuse with the body of the axis.
openaire +1 more source
The odontoid process was once thought to be a displaced body of the atlas but is now believed to have separated from the anterior part of the atlas between the sixth and seventh week of gestation and to have migrated caudally to fuse with the body of the axis.
openaire +1 more source
Blistering of the odontoid process by meningioma
Neuroradiology, 1982The occurrence of blistering (bulging of the bony cortex), previously found only with meningioma of the planum sphenoidale, is reported here affecting the odontoid process in association with a meningioma at C1-C2, anterior to the neuraxis.
openaire +2 more sources
Fracture of odontoid process in children
Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 1972Abstract The essentially benign nature of fractures of the odontoid process in children is described for a personal series of four patients. Such an injury is at the level of the basal odontoid epiphysis, and it is shown that the fracture is essentially stable with a good potential for rapid bony union.
openaire +2 more sources
Fractures of the odontoid process
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2000We treated 183 patients with fractures of the odontoid process (109 type II, 74 type III) non-operatively. Union was achieved in 59 (54%) with type-II fractures. All type-III fractures united, but in 16 patients union was delayed. There was no correlation between union and the clinical or radiological outcome of the fractures.
S. Govender +2 more
openaire +1 more source
2010
Fractures of the C2 odontoid process are the most frequent injuries of the upper cervical spine (UCS). The majority of them are located at the base of the process (Type II). Less frequently, the fracture line passes through the C2 body (Type III) and exceptionally it remains above the transverse ligament (Type I).
P. Suchomel, L. Jurák
openaire +1 more source
Fractures of the C2 odontoid process are the most frequent injuries of the upper cervical spine (UCS). The majority of them are located at the base of the process (Type II). Less frequently, the fracture line passes through the C2 body (Type III) and exceptionally it remains above the transverse ligament (Type I).
P. Suchomel, L. Jurák
openaire +1 more source
Fractures of the odontoid process
min - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, 1971H, Torres, L, Ferguson, T, Norton
openaire +2 more sources
Fractures of the odontoid process.
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume, 2001We treated 183 patients with fractures of the odontoid process (109 type II, 74 type III) non-operatively. Union was achieved in 59 (54%) with type-II fractures. All type-III fractures united, but in 16 patients union was delayed. There was no correlation between union and the clinical or radiological outcome of the fractures.
S, Govender, J F, Maharaj, M R, Haffajee
openaire +1 more source
Osteomyelitis of the Odontoid Process
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 1967R E, Leach, H H, Goldstein, D, Younger
openaire +2 more sources