Results 1 to 10 of about 3,408 (243)

Experiences from the anatomy track in the ontology alignment evaluation initiative [PDF]

Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 2017
Background One of the longest running tracks in the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative is the Anatomy track which focuses on aligning two anatomy ontologies. The Anatomy track was started in 2005.
Zlatan Dragisic, Valentina Ivanova, Huanyu Li, Patrick Lambrix   +3 more
doaj   +9 more sources

Matching disease and phenotype ontologies in the ontology alignment evaluation initiative [PDF]

Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 2017
Background The disease and phenotype track was designed to evaluate the relative performance of ontology matching systems that generate mappings between source ontologies.
Ian Harrow, Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz, Andrea Splendiani, Martin Romacker, Peter Woollard, Scott Markel, Yasmin Alam-Faruque, Martin Koch, James Malone, Arild Waaler   +9 more
doaj   +8 more sources

Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative: Six Years of Experience [PDF]

Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2011
In the area of semantic technologies, benchmarking and systematic evaluation is not yet as established as in other areas of computer science, e.g., information retrieval. In spite of successful attempts, more effort and experience are required in order to achieve such a level of maturity.
Jérôme Euzenat, Christian Meilicke, Heiner Stuckenschmidt   +2 more
exaly   +6 more sources

Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2022 [PDF]

, 2022
The Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) aims at comparing ontology matching systems on precisely defined test cases. These test cases can be based on ontologies of different levels of complexity and use different evaluation modalities. The OAEI 2022 campaign offered 14 tracks and was attended by 18 participants.
Pour, Mina Abd Nikooie, Algergawy, Alsayed, Buche, Patrice, Castro, Leyla Jael, Chen, Jiaoyan, Dong, Hang, Fallatah, Omaima, Faria, Daniel, Fundulaki, Irini, Hertling, Sven, He, Yuan, Horrocks, Ian, Huschka, Martin, Ibanescu, Liliana, Jiménez-Ruiz, Ernesto, Karam, Naouel, Laadhar, Amir, Lambrix, Patrick, Li, Huanyu, Li, Ying, Michel, Franck, Nasr, Engy, Paulheim, Heiko, Pesquita, Catia, Saveta, Tzanina, Shvaiko, Pavel, Trojahn, Cassia, Verhey, Chantelle, Wu, Mingfang, Yaman, Beyza, Zamazal, Ondrej, Zhou, Lu   +31 more
core   +12 more sources

Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2021 [PDF]

, 2021
The Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) aims at comparing ontology matching systems on precisely defined test cases. These test cases can be based on ontologies of different levels of complexity and use different evaluation modalities (e.g., blind evaluation, open evaluation, or consensus).
Abd, Mina, Algergawy, Alsayed, Amardeilh, Florence, Amini, Reihaneh, Fallatah, Omaima, Faria, Daniel, Fundulaki, Irini, Harrow, Ian, Hertling, Sven, Hitzler, Pascal, Huschka, Martin, Ibanescu, Liliana, Jiménez-Ruiz, Ernesto, Karam, Naouel, Laadhar, Amir, Lambrix, Patrick, Li, Huanyu, Li, Ying, Michel, Franck, Nasr, Engy, Paulheim, Heiko, Pesquita, Catia, Portisch, Jan, Roussey, Catherine, Saveta, Tzanina, Shvaiko, Pavel, Splendiani, Andrea, Trojahn, Cassia, Vataščinová, Jana, Yaman, Beyza, Zamazal, Ondřej, Zhou, Lu   +31 more
core   +12 more sources

Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2024 [PDF]

CEUR Workshop Proceedings
The Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) aims at comparing ontology matching systems on precisely defined test cases. These test cases can be based on ontologies of different levels of complexity and use different evaluation modalities. The OAEI 2024 campaign offered 13 tracks and was attended by 13 participants.
Pour, Mina Abd Nikooie, Algergawy, Alsayed, Blomqvist, Eva, Buche, Patrice, Chen, Jiaoyan, Cotovio, Pedro Giesteira, Coulet, Adrien, Cufi, Julien, Dong, Hang, Faria, Daniel, Ferraz, Lucas, Hertling, Sven, He, Yuan, Horrocks, Ian, Ibanescu, Liliana, Jain, Dr Sarika, Jiménez-Ruiz, Ernesto, Karam, Naouel, Kraus, Felix, Lambrix, Patrick, Li, Huanyu, Li, Ying, Monnin, Pierre, Paulheim, Heiko, Pesquita, Catia, Sharma, Abhisek, Shvaiko, Pavel, Silva, Marta, Sousa, Guilherme, Trojahn, Cassia, Vataščinová, Jana, Yaman, Beyza, Zamazal, Ondrej, Zhou, Lu   +33 more
core   +14 more sources

Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2020 [PDF]

https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2788/oaei20_paper0.pdf, 2020
The Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) aims at comparing ontology matching systems on precisely defined test cases. These test cases can be based on ontologies of different levels of complexity and use different evaluation modalities (e.g., blind evaluation, open evaluation, or consensus).
Pour, Mina Abd Nikooie, Algergawy, Alsayed, Amini, Reihaneh, Faria, Daniel, Fundulaki, Irini, Harrow, Ian, Hertling, Sven, Jiménez-Ruiz, Ernesto, Jonquet, Clement, Karam, Naouel, Khiat, Abderrahmane, Laadhar, Amir, Lambrix, Patrick, Li, Huanyu, Li, Ying, Hitzler, Pascal, Paulheim, Heiko, Pesquita, Catia, Saveta, Tzanina, Shvaiko, Pavel, Splendiani, Andrea, Thiéblin, Élodie, Trojahn, Cassia, Vataščinová, Jana, Yaman, Beyza, Zamazal, Ondřej, Zhou, Lu   +26 more
core   +9 more sources

Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2023. [PDF]

, 2023
The Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) aims at comparing ontology matching systems on precisely defined test cases. These test cases can be based on ontologies of different levels of complexity and use different evaluation modalities. The OAEI 2023 campaign offered 15 tracks and was attended by 16 participants.
Pour, Mina Abd Nikooie, Algergawy, Alsayed, Buche, Patrice, Castro, Leyla Jael, Chen, Jiaoyan, Coulet, Adrien, Cufi, Julien, Dong, Hang, Fallatah, Omaima, Faria, Daniel, Fundulaki, Irini, Hertling, Sven, He, Yuan, Horrocks, Ian, Huschka, Martin, Ibanescu, Liliana, Jain, Dr Sarika, Jiménez-Ruiz, Ernesto, Karam, Naouel, Lambrix, Patrick, Li, Huanyu, Li, Ying, Monnin, Pierre, Nasr, Engy, Paulheim, Heiko, Pesquita, Catia, Saveta, Tzanina, Shvaiko, Pavel, Sousa, Guilherme, Trojahn, Cassia, Vataščinová, Jana, Wu, Mingfang, Yaman, Beyza, Zamazal, Ondrej, Zhou, Lu   +34 more
core   +12 more sources

Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2019 [PDF]

, 2019
The Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) aims at comparing ontology matching systems on precisely defined test cases. These test cases can be based on ontologies of different levels of complexity (from simple thesauri to expressive OWL ontologies) and use different evaluation modalities (e.g., blind evaluation, open evaluation, or consensus).
Algergawy, Alsayed, Faria, Daniel, Ferrara, Alfio, Fundulaki, Irini, Harrow, Ian, Hertling, Sven, Jiménez-Ruiz, Ernesto, Karam, Naouel, Khiat, Abderrahmane, Lambrix, Patrick, Li, Huanyu, Montanelli, Stefano, Paulheim, Heiko, Pesquita, Catia, Saveta, Tzanina, Shvaiko, Pavel, Splendiani, Andrea, Thiéblin, Elodie, Trojahn, Cássia, Vataščinová, Jana, Zamazal, Ondrej, Zhou, Lu   +21 more
core   +8 more sources

Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2025. [PDF]

The Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) aims at comparing ontology matching systems on precisely defined test cases. These test cases can be based on ontologies of different levels of complexity and use different evaluation modalities. The OAEI 2025 campaign offered 12 tracks and was attended by 20 participants.
Abd Nikooie Pour, Mina, Blomqvist, Eva, Giesteira Cotovio, Pedro, Coulet, Adrien, Ferraz, Lucas, Hertling, Sven, Jain, Sarika, Jiménez-Ruiz, Ernesto, Kraus, Felix, Lambrix, Patrick, Li, Huanyu, Li, Ying, Liu, Xianhao, Monnin, Pierre, Paulheim, Heiko, Pesquita, Catia, Sharma, Abhisek, Shvaiko, Pavel, Silva, Marta, Sousa, Guilherme, Trojahn, Cassia, Vataščinová, Jana, Yaman, Beyza, Zamazal, Ondrej, Zhou, Lu   +24 more
core   +7 more sources