Results 1 to 10 of about 13,913 (111)

Minimally invasive versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis [PDF]

open access: yesJournal of International Medical Research, 2019
Background We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive radical cystectomy (MIRC) versus open radical cystectomy (ORC) for bladder cancer.
Hongbin Shi   +5 more
doaj   +3 more sources

A comparative study of perioperative outcomes in open radical cystectomy, laparoscopic radical cystectomy, and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy [PDF]

open access: yesUrology Annals
Introduction: Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard treatment for muscle-invasive and high-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. The impact of minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) such as laparoscopic and robot-assisted RC (RARC) on outcomes and ...
Vishal Narkhede   +6 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in a Laparoscopic Naïve Center [PDF]

open access: yesAdvances in Urology, 2021
Background. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy is a challenging surgical procedure; however, it has been largely abandoned in favor of the more intuitive robotic-assisted cystectomy.
Waleed Mohamed Fadlalla   +5 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Robot-Assisted, Laparoscopic, and Open Radical Cystectomy: Pre-Operative Data of 1400 Patients From The Italian Radical Cystectomy Registry [PDF]

open access: yesFrontiers in Oncology, 2022
IntroductionThe Italian Radical Cystectomy Registry (RIC) is an observational prospective study aiming to understand clinical variables and patient characteristics associated with short- and long-term outcomes among bladder cancer (BC) patients ...
Gian Maria Busetto   +40 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Cost-utility analysis of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer compared to open radical cystectomy in the United Kingdom [PDF]

open access: yesPLoS ONE, 2022
Background Bladder cancer is the tenth most common cancer in the United Kingdom. Currently, open radical cystectomy (ORC) is the gold standard. Due to the risk of complications and a 2.3-8% mortality rate1, there is growing interest in the use of robot ...
Felix Machleid   +5 more
doaj   +3 more sources

A Prospective, Observational, Multicentre Study Concerning Nontechnical Skills in Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy [PDF]

open access: yesEuropean Urology Open Science, 2020
Introduction and hypotheses: valuation of surgical skills, both technical and nontechnical, is possible through observations and video analysis. Besides technical failures, adverse outcomes in surgery can also be related to hampered communication ...
Alexander J.W. Beulens   +8 more
doaj   +2 more sources

RAZOR trial: analysis of 3-year follow-up: an era of robotic radical cystectomy: is it a new beginning?

open access: yesAfrican Journal of Urology, 2021
RAZOR (Randomized Open versus Robotic Cystectomy) trial is a phase 3 randomized control trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy with open radical cystectomy for the treatment of bladder cancer published by Parekh et.al.
Satish Kumar Ranjan
doaj   +1 more source

Protocol of the Italian Radical Cystectomy Registry (RIC): a non-randomized, 24-month, multicenter study comparing robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery for radical cystectomy in bladder cancer

open access: yesBMC Cancer, 2021
Background Bladder cancer is the ninth most common type of cancer worldwide. In the past, radical cystectomy via open surgery has been considered the gold-standard treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer.
Angelo Porreca   +34 more
doaj   +1 more source

Robot-Assisted and Open Radical Cystectomy: Comparative Analysis of Results

open access: yesВестник урологии, 2020
Radical cystectomy (RC) remains the main method of surgical treatment of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Currently, in case of radical cystectomy, along with the open, robot-assisted access is actively used. This review presents an analysis
B. G. Guliev, R. R. Bolokotov
doaj   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy