Results 201 to 210 of about 8,389,625 (348)
The economic impact of open science: a scoping review. [PDF]
Tsipouri L +3 more
europepmc +1 more source
The Value of Openness in Open Science
AbstractOpen science is good for both epistemic and social reasons, but in nonobvious ways, it can have detrimental epistemic side effects. Drawing on case studies and the social epistemology of science, I show how practices intended to increase transparency, communication, and information sharing in science can backfire.
openaire +1 more source
Aggressive prostate cancer is associated with pericyte dysfunction
Tumor‐produced TGF‐β drives pericyte dysfunction in prostate cancer. This dysfunction is characterized by downregulation of some canonical pericyte markers (i.e., DES, CSPG4, and ACTA2) while maintaining the expression of others (i.e., PDGFRB, NOTCH3, and RGS5).
Anabel Martinez‐Romero +11 more
wiley +1 more source
Open science must include effective results dissemination to study participants. [PDF]
Tai KH +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
Genetic testing in epithelial ovarian cancer includes both germline and tumor‐testing. This approach often duplicates resources. The current prospective study assessed the feasibility of tumor‐first multigene testing by comparing tumor tissue with germline testing of peripheral blood using an 18‐gene NGS panel in 106 patients.
Elisabeth Spenard +12 more
wiley +1 more source
Reimagining open science for global health: Epistemic power and the pursuit of health equity. [PDF]
Rangel Teixeira A +7 more
europepmc +1 more source
ERRFI1, a neural crest (NC)‐associated gene, was upregulated in melanoma and negatively correlated with the expression of melanocytic differentiation markers and the susceptibility of melanoma cells toward BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi). Knocking down ERRFI1 significantly increased the sensitivity of melanoma cells to BRAFi.
Nina Wang +8 more
wiley +1 more source

