Results 31 to 40 of about 132 (129)

Conceptual engineering: Conceptual innovation via conceptual refinement

Metaphilosophy, Volume 56, Issue 3-4, Page 344-355, July 2025.
Abstract Mona Simion and Christoph Kelp (2020) have recently challenged the traditional conceptual engineering project. They defend a reorientation of this project that moves away from correcting conceptual shortcomings and emphasizes conceptual innovation instead. Central to their proposal is the role played by etiological functions. The present paper
Otávio Bueno
wiley   +1 more source

Introduction to the special issue New Thoughts on Conceptual Engineering

Metaphilosophy, Volume 56, Issue 3-4, Page 283-293, July 2025.
Abstract Conceptual engineering has emerged in recent times as a significant topic in current philosophical literature. The now vast list of references includes works on more general or conceptual issues, such as describing the nature of conceptual engineering, how we may respond to the different objections to it, how it is related to philosophical ...
Xavier de Donato‐Rodríguez
wiley   +1 more source

Buddhismus a aristotelská logika

Filosofie Dnes, 2011
Abstrakt/Abstract   Článek pojednává o buddhistické logice a jejím vztahu k logice aristotelské, zejména k principu sporu a principu vyloučeného třetího.
Jiří Holba
doaj   +1 more source

Hunting for Paradoxes: A Research Strategy for Cognitive Science

Topics in Cognitive Science, Volume 17, Issue 3, Page 770-801, July 2025.
Abstract How should we identify interesting topics in cognitive science? This paper suggests that one useful research strategy is to hunt for, and attempt to resolve, paradoxes: that is, apparent or real contradictions in our understanding of the mind and of thought.
Nick Chater
wiley   +1 more source

Dialetheism and the countermodel problem

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Volume 110, Issue 2, Page 709-733, March 2025.
Abstract According to some dialetheists, we ought to reject the distinction between object and meta‐languages. Given that dialetheists advocate truth‐value gluts within their object‐language, whether in order to solve the liar paradox or for some other reason, this rejection of the object‐/meta‐language distinction comes with the commitment to use a ...
Andreas Fjellstad, Ben Martin
wiley   +1 more source

Models & Proofs: LFIs Without a Canonical Interpretations

Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology, 2018
In different papers, Carnielli, W. & Rodrigues, A. (2012), Carnielli, W. Coniglio, M. & Rodrigues, A. (2017) and Rodrigues & Carnielli, (2016) present two logics motivated by the idea of capturing contradictions as conflicting evidence.
Eduardo Alejandro Barrio
doaj   +1 more source

Unveiling the nature of philosophical problems: Formal and conceptual aspects

Metaphilosophy, Volume 56, Issue 1, Page 17-34, January 2025.
Abstract This paper approximates an intensional definitional distinction between philosophical problems and non‐philosophical problems. It contends that a philosophical problem consists of an inconsistent set M of propositions that satisfies certain characteristics.
Jens Harbecke
wiley   +1 more source

A Paraconsistentist Approach to Chisholm's Paradox

Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology, 2009
The Logics of Deontic (In)Consistency (LDI’s) can be considered as the deontic counterpart of the paraconsistent logics known as Logics of Formal (In)Consistency.
Marcelo Esteban Coniglio, Newton Marques Peron   +1 more
doaj  

Philosophical Interpretations Matter

Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology
In recent years, there has been an increasing debate about some philosophical aspects of paraconsistent logics. The focus of this controversy has been on whether the notion of philosophical interpretation of a logic is separable or independent from the ...
Eduardo Alejandro Barrio, Edson Bezerra, Bruno da Ré   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

BOOK REVIEW: CARNIELLI, Walter & MALINOWSKI, Jacek (eds.). Contradictions, from Consistency to Inconsistency (Trends in Logic 47, Springer International Publishing, 2018, VI+322 pages)

Manuscrito, 2019
In this review I briefly analyse the main elements of each chapter of the book centred in the general areas of logic, epistemology, philosophy and history of science.
RAFAEL R. TESTA
doaj   +1 more source