Results 231 to 240 of about 5,357 (285)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2000
Abstract Although particularism has come under a good deal of scrutiny in the last quarter of a century, particularizing it is not easy, since the arguments and positions advanced by those known as particularists vary considerably.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Although particularism has come under a good deal of scrutiny in the last quarter of a century, particularizing it is not easy, since the arguments and positions advanced by those known as particularists vary considerably.
openaire +1 more source
Philosophy, 1978
Arthur Prior is perhaps best known for his contributions to the philosophy of time. I shall argue here that his views about reference are not easily reconciled with his views about time, and suggest that his views about existence and his acceptance of some dubious Cartesian epistemological principles led him to increasingly bizarre and counter ...
openaire +2 more sources
Arthur Prior is perhaps best known for his contributions to the philosophy of time. I shall argue here that his views about reference are not easily reconciled with his views about time, and suggest that his views about existence and his acceptance of some dubious Cartesian epistemological principles led him to increasingly bizarre and counter ...
openaire +2 more sources
On the particularity of pathogens
Nature, 2000In the elemental struggle between pathogenic microbes and the immune system of the host, each strives for a unique advantage and thus each exploits its own unique particularities in pathogenesis and protection. And each presumably selects for the diversity that generally characterizes the wide range of successful host-pathogen interactions.
openaire +2 more sources
2019
As ‘particulars’ we count objects like computers, mountains, bicycles, and scissors, as well as individuals like Plato, Socrates, and Aristotle. These are all reasonably well-understood entities (at least, that is how they appear at first glance), which might lead one to conclude that so too is their particularity.
openaire +1 more source
As ‘particulars’ we count objects like computers, mountains, bicycles, and scissors, as well as individuals like Plato, Socrates, and Aristotle. These are all reasonably well-understood entities (at least, that is how they appear at first glance), which might lead one to conclude that so too is their particularity.
openaire +1 more source
2004
Despite Rescher’s attempt to leave substance-ontology behind, Rescherian “processes” strongly resemble the “classical individuals” of the substance-ontological tradition- they are concrete, countable, particular and determinate entities. For this reason the suggested process-based approach to an ontological account of things shares crucial shortcomings
openaire +2 more sources
Despite Rescher’s attempt to leave substance-ontology behind, Rescherian “processes” strongly resemble the “classical individuals” of the substance-ontological tradition- they are concrete, countable, particular and determinate entities. For this reason the suggested process-based approach to an ontological account of things shares crucial shortcomings
openaire +2 more sources
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2013
Siun M, Murphy, Steve, Merten
openaire +2 more sources
Siun M, Murphy, Steve, Merten
openaire +2 more sources
1991
Abstract The first section of this chapter discusses three rival ontologies in the Indian context. The Buddhist envisions a world populated by phenomenal particulars. These are called the svalaḳsạnas, ‘self-characterized’. They include both physical phenomena such as colour-patches and mental phenomena, cognitive events and other ...
openaire +1 more source
Abstract The first section of this chapter discusses three rival ontologies in the Indian context. The Buddhist envisions a world populated by phenomenal particulars. These are called the svalaḳsạnas, ‘self-characterized’. They include both physical phenomena such as colour-patches and mental phenomena, cognitive events and other ...
openaire +1 more source
2018
Particulars are to be understood by contrasting them with universals, that term being used to comprise both properties and relations. Often the term ‘individuals’ is used interchangeably with ‘particulars’, though some restrict the term ‘individuals’ to those particulars whose existence has more than momentary duration.
openaire +1 more source
Particulars are to be understood by contrasting them with universals, that term being used to comprise both properties and relations. Often the term ‘individuals’ is used interchangeably with ‘particulars’, though some restrict the term ‘individuals’ to those particulars whose existence has more than momentary duration.
openaire +1 more source
Universalism vs. Particularism: A Round Trip From Sociology to Economics
Review of Social Economy, 2021Guido de Blasio +2 more
exaly