Results 1 to 10 of about 2,171 (131)
In Answer to the Pauline Principle: Consent, Logical Constraints, and Free Will
James Sterba uses the Pauline Principle to argue that the occurrence of significant, horrendous evils is logically incompatible with the existence of a good God.
Marilie Coetsee
doaj +2 more sources
Is There a Right to Hope That God Exists? Evil and the Principle of Non-Parity
In this paper, I respond to James Sterba’s recent book ‘Is a Good God Logically Possible?’ I show that Sterba concludes that God is not logically possible by ignoring three important issues: (a) the different functions of leeway indeterminism (and the ...
Jacqueline Mariña
doaj +3 more sources
Is Theism Incompatible with the Pauline Principle?
This paper criticises James Sterba’s use of the Pauline principle to formulate a logical version of the problem of evil. Sterba’s argument contains a crucial premise: If human agents are always prohibited from doing some action, God is also prohibited ...
Matthew Flannagan
doaj +3 more sources
The Problem of Evil, Greater Good, and the Moral Objection [PDF]
Greater Good Theodicies are among the main responses to the problem of evil. These theodicies look for a greater good that can explain the consistency of the existence of evils and the existence of the omnipotent, omniscient, perfectly good God.
Seyyed Mohsen Eslami +1 more
doaj +1 more source
Colat alius Deum, alius Iovem: Tertullian, Freedom of Religion (libertas religionis) and Religious Pluralism [PDF]
This paper analyses Tertullian’s innovative syntagm “religious freedom” (libertas religionis) from several perspectives, presenting the historical and literary context that enabled the Carthaginian thinker to coin this idea.
Jan Dominik Bogataj
doaj +1 more source
James Sterba argues that a good God is not logically possible. He argues that what he calls the Pauline Principle, which says that we should never do evil that good may come of it, implies that a good God would prevent horrendous evil consequences of ...
Bruce Russell
doaj +1 more source
Comparative study of Oblique action in Iranian, French, and Egyptian law, focusing on Iranian law [PDF]
Oblique action is an exception to the principle of the relative effect of the contract, which permits unsecured creditors or collateralized creditors whose collateral is not worth as much as their claim, under certain conditions, to interfere with the ...
Behzad Jeihouni +1 more
doaj +1 more source
Major Gaps in Sterba’s New Atheological Argument from Evil
In this essay, I first offer several scenarios where Sterba’s argument based on the Pauline Principle fails: specifically, one in which we all consent to living an earthly life in some prior existence (prior-consent scenario), one in which the victims ...
Robin Collins
doaj +1 more source
Sterba’s Logical Argument from Evil and the God Who Walks Away from Omelas
The logical argument from evil, generally thought to have been defused by Alvin Plantinga’s free will defense, has been reinvigorated by James Sterba’s exposition and defense of a new version of the argument that draws on recent work in moral philosophy.
Erik J. Wielenberg
doaj +1 more source

