Results 261 to 270 of about 3,137,448 (307)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Peer Review of Research Abstracts
Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1988Application of a rating theory model to reviews of abstracts submitted to an international research conference resulted in good fit with the data and detection of significant interreviewer differences in reviewer stringency. Computation of calibrated ratings (i.e., those from which reviewer differences had been removed) permitted selection of abstracts
Alice R. Redland +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Political intervention in scientific peer review. Research on adolescent sexual behavior.
American Psychologist, 1993In 1991, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) rescinded funding for a survey of adolescent health risk-taking behavior. The decision overturned a series of scientific and ethical peer and administrative reviews of the research, which had been
William Gardner, Brian L. Wilcox
semanticscholar +1 more source
Peer Review and Research Impact
Customer Needs and Solutions, 2015In academia, citations received by articles are a critical metric for measuring research impact. An important aspect of publishing in academia is the ability of the authors to navigate the review process, and despite its critical role, very little is known about how the review process may impact the research impact of an article.
Girish Mallapragada +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Collective Impact: A Review of the Peer-reviewed Research [PDF]
Australian Social Work, 2019 ABSTRACTCollective Impact (CI) is a framework for collaborative social change that has gained considerable attention over the past seven years.
Ennis, Gretchen, Tofa, Matalena
openaire +2 more sources
New England Journal of Medicine, 1985 Journal peer review is a remote and mysterious business for many research investigators. Four paradigms seem to capture much current opinion about peer review of scientific works submitted for jour...
John C. Bailar, Kay Patterson
openaire +3 more sources
Rigour in research and peer review
Construction Management and Economics, 1997This note discusses rigour in research and in the peer review of academic journals by examining current research into construction conflict and disputes. Comments are made on a paper by Alkass, S., Mazerolle, M. and Harris, F.C. (1996) Construction Management and Economics, 14, 375-394. The paucity of research in this field is discussed and the current
openaire +3 more sources
Peer review of nursing research proposals
American Journal of Critical Care, 1995The grant review process that operationalizes peer review for the critique, scoring, approval, and selection of research grants for funding may intimidate a novice reviewer. This article describes the peer review panel and process of grant review, specifies the role and responsibilities of the reviewer in the review session, and presents considerations
Ruth Lindquist +2 more
openaire +3 more sources
Improving peer review: A guide for reviewers of biomedical research [PDF]
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2002 Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2002) 72, 469–473; doi: 10.1067/mcp.2002 ...
openaire +2 more sources
Peer Review by Nursing Research Committees in Hospitals
Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1996With the increasing amount of nursing research conducted in clinical settings, the value of peer review by nursing research committees (NRCs) in hospitals has come under greater scrutiny. Research facilitation has been the prevailing paradigm of NRCs for several decades. Reports of activities by NRCs in the literature appear to indicate a shift in that
Veronica F. Rempusheski +3 more
openaire +4 more sources
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 2000
Cross-sectional quantitative designs are often used to investigate whether peer victimization is positively related to psychosocial maladjustment. This paper presents a meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies, published between 1978 and 1997, of ...
David S. J. Hawker, M. Boulton
semanticscholar +1 more source
Cross-sectional quantitative designs are often used to investigate whether peer victimization is positively related to psychosocial maladjustment. This paper presents a meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies, published between 1978 and 1997, of ...
David S. J. Hawker, M. Boulton
semanticscholar +1 more source