Results 171 to 180 of about 9,595 (233)

Sex differences late after tetralogy of Fallot repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. [PDF]

open access: yesIndian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
Tan CQY   +4 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Racial Inequity in Prescription of Semaglutide Among Eligible People With HIV. [PDF]

open access: yesDiabetes Care
Hahn AW   +25 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Author Correction: Risk-stratified treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis. [PDF]

open access: yesNat Commun
Chang VK   +27 more
europepmc   +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Reply to Pettit

Analysis, 1993
Philip Pettit [4] accepts this challenge, and responds with a definition of physicalism which he thinks avoids the dilemma. Pettit's definition of physicalism involves four claims, two about entities, two about laws. Claims 1 and 3, concerning the existence of microphysical entities and microphysical laws, should not be questioned.
Tim Crane
openaire   +3 more sources

Pettit on Love and Its Value: A Critical Assessment

Moral Philosophy and Politics, 2018
Abstract Philip Pettit has identified some interesting apparent commonalities among core human values like love, friendship, virtue, and respect. These are all, Pettit argues, ‘robustly demanding’: they require us to provide certain benefits across ranges of alternative scenarios.
Sven Nyholm
openaire   +4 more sources

Are rights less important for republicans than for liberals? Pettit versus Pettit

Contemporary Political Theory, 2016
It has become a commonplace in neo-republican thinking to claim that if the notion of rights can be allowed a place in republican political theory, it can never achieve the prominence that liberalism allegedly grants it. Philip Pettit’s book, Republicanism, provides several arguments to buttress this thesis.
openaire   +5 more sources

A Way Out of Pettit's Dilemma

The Philosophical Quarterly, 2001
Philip Pettit has argued, in ‘Non-consequentialism and Universalizability’, PQ, 50 (2000), pp. 175–90, that there is a tension between non-consequentialism and universalizability. In response I argue that Pettit's argument begs the question against the non-consequentialist, because it falsely assumes that the non-consequentialist must follow the ...
Chappell Timothy, Timothy Chappell
openaire   +3 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy