Results 211 to 220 of about 70,022 (267)
A knowledge graph framework for digital twins of chemical processes. [PDF]
Zhang S, Zhang J, Lapkin AA.
europepmc +1 more source
Ontology development and use for cholangiocarcinoma risk factors and predictions: a term enrichment data analysis and machine learning classification. [PDF]
Pengput A, Diehl AD.
europepmc +1 more source
An ecological model in support of an ontology of mental functioning. [PDF]
Sacco MJ +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
Glucose and Glutamine Define Independent Activation-Braking Metabolic States in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells. [PDF]
Mazzio EA +5 more
europepmc +1 more source
Integrating Protein Language Models with Multimodal Embeddings to Accelerate Function Prediction of Uncharacterized Proteins. [PDF]
Cheng R +5 more
europepmc +1 more source
Harmonising UK primary care prescription records for research: A case study in the UK Biobank
Ytsma CR +7 more
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Philosophy of Science, 1961
The recent philosophy of physics is confronted with the new ontology, as it emerges after philosophy proper has fully articulated the linguistic turn. The classical ontologists asserted or denied, controversially, that certain entities “existed.” Rather than adding to these controversies, the new ontology uncovers their dialectics.
openaire +1 more source
The recent philosophy of physics is confronted with the new ontology, as it emerges after philosophy proper has fully articulated the linguistic turn. The classical ontologists asserted or denied, controversially, that certain entities “existed.” Rather than adding to these controversies, the new ontology uncovers their dialectics.
openaire +1 more source
Philosophy of Science, 1952
Philosophers whose judgment I respect and whose understanding I earnestly desire have criticized the use made of the term “construct” in a recent publication. In particular, Professor Werkmeister1 skillfully advances an argument designed to refute the view2 that verified constructs compose “physical reality.” His argument is very beguiling but, I fear,
openaire +1 more source
Philosophers whose judgment I respect and whose understanding I earnestly desire have criticized the use made of the term “construct” in a recent publication. In particular, Professor Werkmeister1 skillfully advances an argument designed to refute the view2 that verified constructs compose “physical reality.” His argument is very beguiling but, I fear,
openaire +1 more source

