Results 191 to 200 of about 106,967 (283)
Collusion in the Clinic: Constructing Patients' Moral Responsibility to Treat Cancer. [PDF]
Tate A, Stivers T.
europepmc +1 more source
Weaving Political Identities: Jean‐Luc Nancy, Empedocles, and (the Later) Plato
Constellations, EarlyView.
Benjamin Hutchens
wiley +1 more source
Judicial Review: Substance and Procedure
In this article we distinguish two questions about judicial review. First, substance: what acts or decisions are properly subject to the grounds of review? Second, procedure: what acts or decisions are properly reviewable through the judicial review procedure? Then we settle both.
Adam Perry, Angelo Ryu
wiley +1 more source
Cooperative behavior and affect heuristic. When the rationality of love matters. [PDF]
Oliverio A.
europepmc +1 more source
Knowing Receipt, Equitable Proprietary Rights, and Duties of Due Administration
In Byers v Saudi National Bank (2023) the Supreme Court held that a claimant in knowing receipt must have had a ‘continuing equitable proprietary interest’ in the property received by the defendant. Such an interest is commonly understood to include a right to benefit from the property, yet successful claims in knowing receipt have often been made by ...
Lusina Ho, Charles Mitchell
wiley +1 more source
THE CHAINMAKER: How Intermediaries Sustain Urban Policy Initiatives over Time
Abstract Practitioners implementing urban climate initiatives are frequently faced with the intermittent nature of urban projects and the short‐termism of policy experiments. In this conjuncture, understanding how urban transformations are advanced necessitates grasping how small‐scale efforts are carried forward or sustained despite these brief time ...
HANNA HILBRANDT +2 more
wiley +1 more source
Resisting wh-questions in business coaching. [PDF]
Dionne F +3 more
europepmc +1 more source
“Social science is explanation or it is nothing.” Introduction to a debate
Abstract This essay introduces contributions to a special section, which documents and extends a debate on the proposition “Social Science is Explanation or it is Nothing” held at the London School of Economics on October 13th, 2022. It discusses the history of the “Group for Theoretical Debates in Anthropology” led by Tim Ingold, Peter Wade and ...
Monika Krause
wiley +1 more source
This article explains the secrecy paradox, but don't tell anyone! [PDF]
Bergman DM.
europepmc +1 more source
What is social science if not critical?
Abstract This short article represents a contribution to the debate on the motion “Social science is explanation, or it is nothing.” While in the format of parliamentary debating the contribution would fall on the side of the opposition, I will not be arguing against explanation as such.
Jana Bacevic
wiley +1 more source

