Results 1 to 10 of about 11,396,221 (294)

Public funding for mitochondrial donation: An Australian public deliberation [PDF]

BMC Medical Ethics
Background Mitochondrial donation (MD) is a reproductive technique that aims to allow individuals at-risk of having a child with mitochondrial DNA disease avoid this outcome.
Ainsley J. Newson, Jane Williams, Giuliana Fuscaldo, Ashleigh Hill, Ezra Kneebone, Karinne Ludlow, Catherine Mills, Megan Munsie, Sarah Norris, Paul Scuffham, Liz Sutton, David R. Thorburn, Chris Degeling   +12 more
doaj   +4 more sources

Assessing Facilitator Fidelity to Principles of Public Deliberation: Tutorial [PDF]

JMIR Formative Research, 2023
Public deliberation, or deliberative democracy, is a method used to elicit informed perspectives and justifiable solutions to ethically fraught or contentious issues that affect multiple stakeholder groups with conflicting interests ...
Claire Draucker, Andrés Carrión, Mary A Ott, Amelia Knopf   +3 more
doaj   +2 more sources

The Effectiveness of Adaptations for Online Remote Public Deliberation Across Three Continents: Mixed Methods Study [PDF]

Journal of Participatory Medicine
BackgroundPublic deliberation is a qualitative research method that has successfully been used to solicit laypeople’s perspectives on health ethics topics, but it remains unclear whether this traditionally in-person method can be translated to the online
Carly Marten, Emily Bampton, Elin A Björling, Anne-Marie Burn, Emma Carey, Blossom Fernandes, Jasmine Kalha, Simthembile Lindani, Hedwick Masomera, Lakshmi Neelakantan, Swetha Ranganathan, Himani Shah, Refiloe Sibisi, Solveig K Sieberts, Sushmita Sumant, Christine Suver, Yanga Thungana, Jennifer Velloza, Augustina Mensa-Kwao, Pamela Y Collins, Mina Fazel, Tamsin Ford, Melvyn Freeman, Soumitra Pathare, Zukiswa Zingela, Megan Doerr   +25 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Discussion structures as tools for public deliberation. [PDF]

Public Underst Sci, 2020
We propose the use of discussion structures as tools for analyzing policy debates in a way that enables the increased participation of lay stakeholders. Discussion structures are argumentation-theoretical tools that can be employed to tackle three barriers that separate lay stakeholders from policy debates: difficulty, magnitude, and complexity.
Popa EO, Blok V, Wesselink R.
europepmc   +5 more sources

Public deliberation on health gain measures. [PDF]

Health Aff Sch
Abstract Researchers and decision-makers use health gain measures to assess the value of health interventions. However, our current understanding of how these measures are understandable and accessible to the community is limited. This study examined a diverse group of stakeholders’ attitudes and preferences for 9 commonly used health ...
Lin CH, Lavelle TA, Phillips MC, Riley AG, Ollendorf D.   +4 more
europepmc   +3 more sources

Future Directions for Public Deliberation

Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 2005
Archon Fung, John Gastil, Peter Levine
doaj   +3 more sources

The Public and Smoking: Fear or Calm Deliberation? [PDF]

Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1958
exaly   +3 more sources

Evaluating Public Deliberation: Including the Audience Perspective

Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 2021
I argue that in evaluating public deliberation, the basic criterion should be how deliberating citizens’ need for usable input is met, rather than how the debaters embody Habermasian consensus-oriented ideals, and I question assessment of “deliberative ...
Christian Kock
doaj   +2 more sources

Group Identity in Public Deliberation

Informal Logic, 2023
I argue that different argumentative practices require participants to categorize themselves in different modes. Accordingly, I distinguish four types of argumentation: rational argumentation, intergroup argumentation, intragroup argumentation, and ...
Hubert Marraud
doaj   +1 more source

Public deliberation and the justification of public service media

International Journal of Cultural Policy
Giles Moss
exaly   +3 more sources