Results 21 to 30 of about 257,548 (304)
Sciences normatives, procédures neutres
Philosophia Scientiæ, 2018 Why should public deliberation play a central role in deciding the ethical and political norms which guide science? Taking examples from welfare economics, this paper argues that (i) the putative norms guiding science ought to be decided using a value ...
Marc-Kevin Daoust
doaj +1 more source
Implications for democracy of a networked bureaucratic world [PDF]
, 1997 Dwight Waldo wrote nearly fifty years ago that democracy is very much more than the political context in which public administration is carried out. Public administration is now less hierarchical and insular and is increasingly networked.
O'Toole Jr, Laurence J.
core +2 more sources
Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2013 Public deliberation provides an inclusive and robust mechanism for making shared decisions in community and political settings; however, its application to teaching and learning remains underutilized (McMillan & Harriger, 2007).
Matthew Johnson +6 more
doaj +1 more source
Democratising biotechnology?: Deliberation, participation and social regulation in a neo-liberal world [PDF]
, 2010 There is now significant policy and academic interest in the governance of science and technology for sustainable development. In recent years this has come to include a growing emphasis on issues of public understanding of science and innovative ...
Newell, Peter
core +1 more source
Just Talk: Public Deliberation After 9/11
Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 2007 Critics of public deliberation as conventionally practiced have charged that it is “just talk” in the sense both that it substitutes sociable conversation for practical deliberation and that it substitutes political talk for political action.
Francesca Polletta
doaj +2 more sources
Robust Deliberative Democracy [PDF]
, 2016 Deliberative democracy aspires to secure political liberty by making citizens the authors of their laws. But how can it do this in the face of deep disagreement, not to mention imperfect knowledge and limited altruism?
Layman, Daniel
core +1 more source
Synthesising the outputs of deliberation: Extracting meaningful results from a public forum
Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 2013 Recent years have seen an increase in empirical studies of public deliberation. This has led to important advances in thinking through issues such as who to include, how best to inform lay audiences about a particular topic, and how to maximise the ...
Kieran C. O’Doherty
doaj +2 more sources
With Habermas against Habermas. Deliberation without Consensus
Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 2019 Habermas’s conception of deliberative democracy combines two concepts—deliberation and consensus—which, I argue, draw his theory in two opposite directions.
Katarzyna Jezierska
doaj +2 more sources
Subgroup deliberation and voting [PDF]
, 2015 We consider three mechanisms for the aggregation of information in heterogeneous committees voting by Unanimity rule: Private Voting and voting preceded by either Plenary or Subgroup Deliberation.
A Meirowitz +13 more
core +1 more source
Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 2023 Leaders can be essential in setting the tone of deliberation in the public sphere, but can their discursive style influence the wider public sphere? Mass communication usually mediates leader-citizen interactions, and the proliferation of social media ...
Audrey Angelina Susin +1 more
doaj +2 more sources