Results 241 to 250 of about 819,739 (287)
Values-based approach to reducing publication bias.
Stephen Curry (377421) +42 more
openalex +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
2021
Abstract Publication bias, defined as a “tendency for positive results to be overrepresented in the published literature,” was recognized and bemoaned as early as the 17th century by the chemist Robert Boyle. In the latter half of the 20th century, it began to be recognized as an increasingly serious scientific problem characterized by a
Mathias Harrer +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Abstract Publication bias, defined as a “tendency for positive results to be overrepresented in the published literature,” was recognized and bemoaned as early as the 17th century by the chemist Robert Boyle. In the latter half of the 20th century, it began to be recognized as an increasingly serious scientific problem characterized by a
Mathias Harrer +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
In drug development, clinical medicine, or health policy making, basing one's decisions on a selective part of the available evidence can pose a major threat to the health of patients and the society. If, for example, primarily positive research reports are taken into account, one could wrongfully conclude that a harmful drug is safe.
Leon, Bax, Karel G, Moons
openaire +2 more sources
In drug development, clinical medicine, or health policy making, basing one's decisions on a selective part of the available evidence can pose a major threat to the health of patients and the society. If, for example, primarily positive research reports are taken into account, one could wrongfully conclude that a harmful drug is safe.
Leon, Bax, Karel G, Moons
openaire +2 more sources
Publication Policy or Publication Bias?
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2005Although “a large number of studies have appeared in the literature that report associations of low penetrance genetic variants with disease,” as suggested in the recent CEBP editorial ([1][1]), hardly any of these reports have been translated into solid results by replication studies, at ...
Graham, Byrnes +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2012
This article offers three contributions for conducting meta-analytic reviews in education research. First, we review publication bias and the challenges it presents for meta-analytic researchers. Second, we review the most recent and optimal techniques for evaluating the presence and influence of publication bias in meta-analyses.
George C. Banks +2 more
openaire +1 more source
This article offers three contributions for conducting meta-analytic reviews in education research. First, we review publication bias and the challenges it presents for meta-analytic researchers. Second, we review the most recent and optimal techniques for evaluating the presence and influence of publication bias in meta-analyses.
George C. Banks +2 more
openaire +1 more source
JAMA, 1992
The appearance of an article in the pages ofTHE JOURNALis the result of a complex and lengthy process. Scores of people, acting as investigators, funding agents, members of institutional review boards, authors, reviewers, and editors, make decisions that influence what is published. Each decision may be subject to biases: the conscious and subconscious
openaire +1 more source
The appearance of an article in the pages ofTHE JOURNALis the result of a complex and lengthy process. Scores of people, acting as investigators, funding agents, members of institutional review boards, authors, reviewers, and editors, make decisions that influence what is published. Each decision may be subject to biases: the conscious and subconscious
openaire +1 more source
Political Analysis, 1999
In political science and many other disciplines, statistically significant results—rejections of the null hypothesis—are achieved more frequently in published than in unpublished studies. Such “publication bias” is generally seen as the consequence of a widespread prejudice against statistically nonsignificant results.
openaire +1 more source
In political science and many other disciplines, statistically significant results—rejections of the null hypothesis—are achieved more frequently in published than in unpublished studies. Such “publication bias” is generally seen as the consequence of a widespread prejudice against statistically nonsignificant results.
openaire +1 more source
2017
Publication bias refers to the tendency of research results to be selectively published depending on their nature and direction, with positive and significant findings that are in line with theory being more likely to get published. This bias has been detected at the level of authors, reviewers, and journal editors alike.
openaire +2 more sources
Publication bias refers to the tendency of research results to be selectively published depending on their nature and direction, with positive and significant findings that are in line with theory being more likely to get published. This bias has been detected at the level of authors, reviewers, and journal editors alike.
openaire +2 more sources