Results 251 to 260 of about 2,697,539 (281)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Qualitative Evaluation Methods
2018The qualitative evaluation methods presented in this chapter play a complementary role to the quantitative methods referred to in the previous chapter of this book. The author shows wider aspects regarding qualitative research, in addition to detailed remarks concerning fieldwork observation.
Kenneth J. Linfield, Emil J. Posavac
openaire +2 more sources
Evaluating Qualitative Research
2017This book provides the qualitative research community with some insight on how to evaluate the quality of qualitative research. This topic has gained little attention during the past few decades. We, qualitative researchers, read journal articles, serve on masters’ and doctoral committees, and also make decisions on whether conference proposals ...
Ben Kei Daniel, Tony Harland
openaire +2 more sources
Evaluating Qualitative Research
2023Abstract In this chapter the authors discuss the importance of evaluating qualitative research, as well as different ideas about what counts as quality research. They explain different kinds of criteria for evaluating qualitative research, such as usefulness and saturation, and discuss criteria for evaluating arts-based research.
Sandra L. Faulkner, Joshua D. Atkinson
openaire +1 more source
Evaluating Qualitative Research
2014This chapter addresses a wide range of theories and practices related to the evaluation of qualitative research (EQR). First, six categories of EQR are presented: (1) a positivist category, (2) Lincoln and Guba’s alternative category, (3) a “subtle-realist” category developed by Hammersley and Atkinson, and Seale, (4) a general EQR category, (5) a ...
Jeasik Cho, Allen Trent
openaire +1 more source
2019
Between January and July 2017, the Liverpool City Council Public Health Team (LCC PHT) ran a pilot Inequality and Bowel Cancer Screening (IBCS) intervention in Riverside, Kensington, and Picton Liverpool Clinical Commissioning Group (LCCG) Neighbourhoods, with the aim of reducing inequalities in BCS uptake rates. The intervention focused on these three
Saini, Pooja +5 more
openaire +1 more source
Between January and July 2017, the Liverpool City Council Public Health Team (LCC PHT) ran a pilot Inequality and Bowel Cancer Screening (IBCS) intervention in Riverside, Kensington, and Picton Liverpool Clinical Commissioning Group (LCCG) Neighbourhoods, with the aim of reducing inequalities in BCS uptake rates. The intervention focused on these three
Saini, Pooja +5 more
openaire +1 more source
Evaluating qualitative research
Journal of Orthopaedic Nursing, 2008Summary As part of our occasional series on how to do research, this article provides an introduction to the varieties of research methods that are collectively known as qualitative methods. These methods are frequently used in nursing research, and are characterised by the use of narrative accounts rather than numerical analyses. The article explores
openaire +1 more source
Qualitative Research in Programme Evaluation
2010Book abstract: The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Methods in Health Research is a comprehensive and authoritative source on qualitative research methods.
MacPherson, I, McKie, Linda
openaire +3 more sources
Qualitative Methods in Program Evaluation
American Journal of Health Promotion, 1991The choice of evaluation methodology is as important as any part of the assessment process. In the past, most selections have been made from among various quantitative strategies and techniques. Recently, program evaluation researchers have begun to discuss some of the limitations of quantitative techniques for addressing some evaluation questions. In
openaire +2 more sources
Evaluating qualitative research
2004FOCUS QUESTIONS • Why is evaluation of qualitative research necessary? • What are the differences between the evaluation of qualitative research and quantitative research? • Are there criteria specific to qualitative research which should be used in its evaluation?
openaire +1 more source