Results 1 to 10 of about 33,262 (282)
Questionable research practices survey
A survey questionnaire on questionable research practices. Items adapted from Wicherts et al. (2016)
Lysander James Montilla Doble
openaire +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Questionable Research Practices: HARKing
Journal of Nursing EducationTo finish out the Methodology Corner's focus in 2025 on questionable research practices, attention is called to the problem of HARKing. When research works omit that a finding being reported on and explained was discovered post hoc, a number of unwanted problems can ensue.
John M. Taylor
openaire +3 more sources
Questionable Research Practices: Cherry Picking
Journal of Nursing EducationIn keeping with the focus on questionable research practices in 2025, this entry of the Methodology Corner calls attention to the practice of cherry picking. Studies subject to cherry picking have the potential to introduce inaccurate information into the nurse education literature.
John M Taylor
openaire +3 more sources
Investigating researcher perceptions of Questionable Research Practices
Journal of Second Language StudiesAbstract In quantitative applied linguistics research, the ethical grey zone between responsible conduct of research and blatant misconduct covers numerous researcher practices that may be more or less ethical depending on situational variables (e.g., context, researcher intent).
Scott Sterling +4 more
openaire +2 more sources
Questionable Research Practices: p -Hacking
Journal of Nursing EducationThe Methodology Corner has opted to call attention to questionable research practices in 2025. This first column of the year specifically looks at p -hacking. Studies subject to p-hacking may be harmful to the science of nursing education.
John M Taylor
openaire +3 more sources
On the frequency, prevalence, and perceived severity of questionable research practices
Tove Larsson +2 more
exaly +2 more sources
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2022
Summary Questionable research practices (QRPs) among researchers have been a source of concern in many fields of study. QRPs are often used to enhance the probability of achieving statistical significance which affects the likelihood of a paper being ...
Sven Kepes +2 more
exaly +2 more sources
Summary Questionable research practices (QRPs) among researchers have been a source of concern in many fields of study. QRPs are often used to enhance the probability of achieving statistical significance which affects the likelihood of a paper being ...
Sven Kepes +2 more
exaly +2 more sources
Research data mismanagement – from questionable research practice to research misconduct
Accountability in Research, 2023Good record keeping practice and research data management underlie responsible research conduct and promote reproducibility of research findings in the sciences. In many cases of research misconduct, inadequate research data management frequently appear as an accompanying finding.
Nicole Shu Ling Yeo-Teh, Bor Luen Tang
openaire +2 more sources
Questionable Research Practices Revisited
Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2015The current discussion of questionable research practices (QRPs) is meant to improve the quality of science. It is, however, important to conduct QRP studies with the same scrutiny as all research. We note problems with overestimates of QRP prevalence and the survey methods used in the frequently cited study by John, Loewenstein, and Prelec.
Klaus Fiedler, Norbert Schwarz
openaire +1 more source
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2017
National Institutes of Health principal investigators reported their perceptions of the ethical defensibility, prevalence in their field, and their personal willingness to engage in questionable research practices (QRPs). Using ethical defensibility ratings, an exploratory factor analysis yielded a two-factor solution: behaviors considered ...
Sacco, Donald F. +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
National Institutes of Health principal investigators reported their perceptions of the ethical defensibility, prevalence in their field, and their personal willingness to engage in questionable research practices (QRPs). Using ethical defensibility ratings, an exploratory factor analysis yielded a two-factor solution: behaviors considered ...
Sacco, Donald F. +2 more
openaire +2 more sources

