Results 1 to 10 of about 1,272,443 (238)

“A Matter of Chance”: An Epistemological Interpretation of Chance in Radical Behaviorism [PDF]

open access: yesPsicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa
The concept of chance cited by B. F. Skinner was not subject to a detailed examination to elucidate changes in his explanatory system. This article explains and discusses the meanings of chance identified in the author’s texts.
Christian Silva dos Reis   +1 more
doaj   +5 more sources

Probability and radical behaviorism. [PDF]

open access: yesBehav Anal, 1992
The concept of probability appears to be very important in the radical behaviorism of Skinner. Yet, it seems that this probability has not been accurately defined and is still ambiguous. I give a strict, relative frequency interpretation of probability and its applicability to the data from the science of behavior as supplied by cumulative records. Two
Espinosa JM.
europepmc   +4 more sources

Epistemological barriers to radical behaviorism. [PDF]

open access: yesBehav Anal, 1998
The historian and philosopher of science Gaston Bachelard proposed the concept of epistemological barriers to describe the intellectual challenges encountered by scientists in their work. In order to embrace novel ways of approaching a problem in science, scientists must overcome barriers or obstacles posed by their prior views.
O'Donohue WT   +2 more
europepmc   +4 more sources

Radical behaviorism and buddhism: complementarities and conflicts. [PDF]

open access: yesBehav Anal, 2008
Comparisons have been made between Buddhism and the philosophy of science in general, but there have been only a few attempts to draw comparisons directly with the philosophy of radical behaviorism. The present review therefore considers heretofore unconsidered points of comparison between Buddhism and radical behaviorism in terms of their respective ...
Diller JW, Lattal KA.
europepmc   +4 more sources

Radical behaviorism and the subjective-objective distinction. [PDF]

open access: yesBehav Anal, 1995
The distinction between subjective and objective domains is central to traditional psychology, including the various forms of mediational stimulus-organism-response neobehaviorism that treat the elements of a subjective domain as hypothetical constructs. Radical behaviorism has its own unique perspective on the subjective-objective distinction.
Moore J.
europepmc   +4 more sources

On concepts of action and behavior as the implicit point of agreement between Enactivism and Radical Behaviorism

open access: yesAsian Journal of Philosophy
In psychology, the principle of “Behaviorism” has a negative connotation. The ascription of the philosophical stance as “behaviorist” is usually nuanced with criticism, and those labeled behaviorists often deny it (For example, Gallagher says, “But then,
Hiroshi Matsui, Matsui Hiroshi
exaly   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy