Results 231 to 240 of about 23,193 (292)
Perceived Reasonableness and Morals in Service Encounters
Journal of Business Ethics, 2014 Companies have a moral responsibility to treat customers fairly. One way for companies to do so is to allow their employees to exercise reasonableness in their interactions with customers.
Nobuyuki Fukawa, Sunil Erevelles
exaly +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Reasoning . . . what reasoning?
Developmental Science, 2004SCOPUS: no ...
Bremner, Andrew, Mareschal, Denis
openaire +3 more sources
The Non-Identical Twins in UK Public Law: Reasonableness and Proportionality [PDF]
Israel Law Review, 2017 Ever since the Wednesbury decision in 1947 UK courts and UK public law scholars have been struggling to comprehend the meaning of ‘reasonableness’ and its relation to ‘proportionality’. The main purpose of this article is to promote conceptual clarity in
Yossi Nehushtan
exaly +2 more sources
To reason or not to reason: Is autobiographical reasoning always beneficial?
New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011Autobiographical reasoning has been found to be a critical process in identity development; however, the authors suggest that existing research shows that such reasoning may not always be critical to another important outcome: well-being. The authors describe characteristics of people such as personality and age, contexts such as conversations, and ...
Kate C, McLean, Cade D, Mansfield
openaire +2 more sources
Theory & Psychology, 1994
The concept of rationality has its roots in a historic philosophical conception of human beings as creatures of reason. To act on the basis of reason is to act on the basis of reasons, which in turn implies a process of reasoning. An objectivist conception of rationality sees its essence as lying in the use of reasoning processes that conform to ...
openaire +1 more source
The concept of rationality has its roots in a historic philosophical conception of human beings as creatures of reason. To act on the basis of reason is to act on the basis of reasons, which in turn implies a process of reasoning. An objectivist conception of rationality sees its essence as lying in the use of reasoning processes that conform to ...
openaire +1 more source
IS REASONABLE DOUBT REASONABLE?
Legal Theory, 2003This paper analyses the multiple tensions and confusions in appellate-court efforts to explain the criminal standard of proof. It concludes that the ambiguous and highly subjectivist character of the Supreme Court's recent glosses on this conception render it virtually meaningless.
openaire +1 more source
1996
Several varieties of metareasoning are discussed. The prototypical case is argument analysis, namely the interpretation and/or evaluation of arguments. A second special case is self-reflective argumentation. A third case is methodological reflection, namely the formulation, interpretation, evaluation, and application of methodological principles; these
openaire +1 more source
Several varieties of metareasoning are discussed. The prototypical case is argument analysis, namely the interpretation and/or evaluation of arguments. A second special case is self-reflective argumentation. A third case is methodological reflection, namely the formulation, interpretation, evaluation, and application of methodological principles; these
openaire +1 more source