Results 231 to 240 of about 35,903 (275)

Allosteric nanobodies to study the interactions between SOS1 and RAS. [PDF]

Nat Commun
Fischer B, Uchański T, Sheryazdanova A, Gonzalez S, Volkov AN, Brosens E, Zögg T, Kalichuk V, Ballet S, Versées W, Sablina AA, Pardon E, Wohlkönig A, Steyaert J.   +13 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Nuclear retention of unspliced HIV-1 RNA as a reversible post-transcriptional block in latency. [PDF]

Nat Commun
Dorman A, Bendoumou M, Valaitienė A, Wadas J, Ali H, Dutilleul A, Maiuri P, Nestola L, Bociaga-Jasik M, Mchantaf G, Necsoi C, De Wit S, Avettand-Fenoël V, Marcello A, Pyrc K, Pasternak AO, Van Lint C, Kula-Pacurar A.   +17 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

The Brussels I-bis Regulation

2023
The Brussels I-bis Regulation remains the most significant legal instrument for procedural law in the EU, providing the cornerstone for questions of international jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. This authoritative book provides a thorough and practical analysis of the Regulation, with particular focus on its ...
Lazić, V., Mankowski, P.
exaly   +5 more sources

Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Greece under the Brussels I-bis Regulation

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015
The purpose of this paper is to briefly present the major findings of the nearly 25-year implementation of the aforementioned instruments in the Greek legal order. The paper will elaborate briefly on the new landscape following the entry into force of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 [Brussels I-bis Regulation].
Apostolos Anthimos
exaly   +3 more sources

Arbitration and the Brussels I bis Regulation: London Steam-Ship Owners’ Mutual Insurance Association

Common Market Law Review, 2023
Burkhard Hess
exaly   +3 more sources

Choice of Court Agreements in the New Brussels I-bis Regulation: A Critical Appraisal

2014
I. Queirolo
exaly   +4 more sources

SURVEYING THE PROPOSED BRUSSELS I BIS REGULATION – SOLID FOUNDATIONS BUT RENOVATION NEEDED

2011
A. Dickinson
exaly   +3 more sources

Residual Jurisdiction under the Brussels I bis Regulation

2020
The chapter examines the avenues for redress with reference to human rights violations performed by multinational corporations. Specifically, it reviews the practice of EU Member States, discusses the conceptual and normative foundations of domestic residual jurisdiction under Article 6 of the Brussels I bis Regulation, and assesses its potential for ...
M. Manna
openaire   +3 more sources

Collective Redress in the Proposal for a Brussels I bis Regulation: A Coherent Approach?

Zeitschrift für Europäisches Unternehmens- und Verbraucherrecht, 2012
In rund der Halfte der EU Mitgliedstaaten gibt es bereits Regelungen zur kollektiven Rechtsdurchsetzung. Wenngleich die Herangehensweise an die komplexe Materie des kollektiven Rechtsschutzes national sehr unterschiedlich ist, steht doch ein Element stets im Zentrum des Regelungsbedurfnisses, namlich die Einfuhrung spezieller Verfahrensgarantien fur ...
L. C. Piñeiro
openaire   +2 more sources

The Conflict of Regulations between the Brussels I(Bis) and Rome II Regulation: Europeanisation of the 'Fumus Boni Iuris Rule'

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2014
In European private international law, the ECJ has been particularly thoughtful of promoting legal certainty in its interpretation of the main legal instruments. However, Article 15, d) Rome II and Article 31 (35) Brussels I(bis) both appear to govern provisional measures without any clarification by the ECJ.
Mitchell Selie
openaire   +2 more sources