Results 251 to 260 of about 10,008 (302)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Duality for algebras of relevant logics
Studia Logica, 1996zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Alasdair Urquhart, Urquhart Alasdair
exaly +3 more sources
Hyperintensionality in Relevant Logics [PDF]
, 2023 In this article, we present a definition of a hyperintensionality appropriate to relevant logics. We then show that relevant logics are hyperintensional in this sense, drawing consequences for other non-classical logics, including HYPE and some ...
Standefer, Shawn
openaire +2 more sources
Non-Boolean classical relevant logics II: Classicality through truth-constants [PDF]
SynthÈse, 2021 This paper gives an account of Anderson and Belnap's selection criteria for an adequate theory of entailment. The criteria are grouped into three categories: criteria pertaining to modality, those pertaining to relevance, and those related to expressive ...
Tore Fjetland Øgaard +1 more
exaly +2 more sources
Non-Boolean classical relevant logics I [PDF]
SynthÈse, 2019 Relevant logics have traditionally been viewed as paraconsistent. This paper shows that this view of relevant logics is wrong. It does so by showing forth a logic which extends classical logic, yet satisfies the Entailment Theorem as well as the variable
Tore Fjetland Øgaard +1 more
exaly +2 more sources
Simplified semantics for relevant logics (and some of their rivals)
Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1993 This paper continues the work of Priest and Sylvan in Simplified Semantics for Basic Relevant Logics, a paper on the simplified semantics of relevant logics, such as B+ and B.
Greg Restall, Restall Greg
exaly +2 more sources
Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2020
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +2 more sources
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +2 more sources
Synthese, 1978
When we judge the probability of a statement r we try to take into account as much information as possible. But not all information that we have, or can obtain, is relevant to r, and it is only relevant information that is of any importance. Thus ‘relevance’ ought to be a central concept in the philosophy of science. However, the logical foundations of
openaire +3 more sources
When we judge the probability of a statement r we try to take into account as much information as possible. But not all information that we have, or can obtain, is relevant to r, and it is only relevant information that is of any importance. Thus ‘relevance’ ought to be a central concept in the philosophy of science. However, the logical foundations of
openaire +3 more sources
QUANTIFIED MODAL RELEVANT LOGICS
The Review of Symbolic Logic, 2021AbstractHere, I combine the semantics of Mares and Goldblatt [20] and Seki [29, 30] to develop a semantics for quantified modal relevant logics extending ${\bf B}$ . The combination requires demonstrating that the Mares–Goldblatt approach is apt for quantified extensions of ${\bf B}$ and other relevant logics, but no significant bridging principles ...
openaire +1 more source
The Review of Symbolic Logic, 2014
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +2 more sources
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +2 more sources
A Pretabular Classical Relevance Logic
Studia Logica, 2012zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Lisa Galminas, John G. Mersch
openaire +1 more source