Results 281 to 290 of about 10,008 (302)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Relevance logics are a misunderstood lot. Despite being the subject of intense study for nearly a century, they remain maligned as too complicated, too abstruse, or too silly to be worth learning much about. This Element aims to dispel these misunderstandings.
openaire +1 more source
openaire +1 more source
Implementing Modal and Relevance Logics in a Logical Framework.
1996We present a framework for machine implementation of both partial and complete fragments of large families of non-classical logics such as modal, relevance, and intuitionistic logics. We decompose a logic into two interacting parts, each a natural deduction system: a base logic of labelled formulae, and a theory of labels characterizing the properties ...
BASIN D., MATTHEWS S., VIGANO', Luca
openaire +2 more sources
Generalizing the Depth Relevance Condition: Deep Relevant Logics Not Included in R-Mingle
Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 2014Gemma Robles, JOSÉ M Méndez
exaly
A Routley-Meyer Type Semantics for Relevant Logics Including Br Plus the Disjunctive Syllogism
Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2009Gemma Robles +2 more
exaly
Completeness and conservative extension results for some boolean relevant logics
Studia Logica, 1989Steve Giambrone +2 more
exaly
On the hyperintensionality of relevant logics and some of their rivals
SynthÈseShawn Standefer, Standefer Shawn
exaly
Mechanizing relevant logics with HOL
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1998Hajime Sawamura, Sawamura Hajime
exaly

