Results 61 to 70 of about 30,295,265 (277)

The future of research assessment in the humanities: bottom-up assessment procedures

open access: yesPalgrave Communications, 2017
Research assessment in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) is delicate. Assessment procedures meet strong criticisms from SSH scholars and bibliometric research shows that the methods that are usually applied are ill-adapted to SSH research.
M. Ochsner, Sven E. Hug, Ioana Galleron
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Towards Research Excellence for Development: The Research Quality plus (RQ+) Assessment Instrument [PDF]

open access: yes, 2014
This document presents a framework and practical guidelines for assessing the quality of research for development. Referred to as the "RQ+"1 assessment instrument, it serves as a tool to guide the work of external evaluators hired by IDRC as part of the ...

core  

Measuring back: bibliodiversity and the Journal Impact Factor™ brand, a case study of IF-journals included in the 2021 Journal Citations Report™

open access: yesInsights: The UKSG Journal
Little attention has been devoted to whether the impact factor (IF) can be considered a responsible metric in light of bibliodiversity. This article critically engages with this question in measuring the following variables of IF journals included in the
Marjorie Bardiau, Christophe Dony
doaj   +1 more source

“When You Use Social Media You Are Not Working”: Barriers for the Use of Metrics in Social Sciences

open access: yesFrontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 2019
The Social Sciences have long been struggling with quantitative forms of research assessment—insufficient coverage in prominent citation indices and overall lower citation counts than in STM subject areas have led to a widespread weariness regarding ...
Steffen Lemke   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

Research assessment in the humanities: problems and challenges [PDF]

open access: yes, 2010
Research assessment is going to play a new role in the governance of universities and research institutions. Evaluation of results is evolving from a simple tool for resource allocation towards policy design.
Galimberti Paola,
core  

A new twist on peer review

open access: yeseLife, 2018
eLife is conducting a trial in which authors will decide how to respond to the issues raised during peer review.
Mark Patterson, Randy Schekman
doaj   +1 more source

Understanding of research, genetics and genetic research in a rapid ethical assessment in north west Cameroon [PDF]

open access: yes, 2015
BACKGROUND There is limited assessment of whether research participants in low-income settings are afforded a full understanding of the meaning of medical research. There may also be particular issues with the understanding of genetic research.
Bhutta   +12 more
core   +1 more source

Room at the top

open access: yeseLife, 2017
Five years after eLife published its first papers, we reflect on our consultative approach to peer review, the challenges of reproducibility, and the need to reform how published research is assessed.
Randy Schekman
doaj   +1 more source

Inefficiency in selecting products for submission to national research assessment exercises [PDF]

open access: yesScientometrics, 2014
One of the critical issues in national research assessment exercises concerns the choice of whether to evaluate the entire scientific portfolio of the institutions or a subset composed of the best products.
G. Abramo   +2 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Global trends in oncology research: A mixed‐methods study of publications and clinical trials from 2010 to 2019

open access: yesCancer Reports, 2023
Purpose To evaluate the cancer research effort of some major countries over two 5‐year periods (2010–2014 and 2015–2019) on the basis of scientific publications and interventional clinical trial metrics and to analyze the relationship between research ...
Vincent Akiki   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy