Measuring inconsistency in research ethics committee review [PDF]
BMC Medical Ethics, 2017 Background The review of human participant research by Research Ethics Committees (RECs) or Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) is a complex multi-faceted process that cannot be reduced to an algorithm. However, this does not give RECs/ IRBs permission to
Samantha Trace, Simon Erik Kolstoe
doaj +2 more sources
Clinics, 2009 INTRODUCTION: It is important to know the reasons for resubmitting research projects to the Research Ethics Committee in order to help researchers to prepare their research projects, informed consent forms and needed research documentation.
Mariana Bueno +5 more
doaj +3 more sources
Research ethics review at University Eduardo Mondlane (UEM)/Maputo Central Hospital, Mozambique (2013–2016): a descriptive analysis of the start-up of a new research ethics committee (REC) [PDF]
BMC Medical Ethics, 2018 Background Mozambique has seen remarkable growth in biomedical research over the last decade. To meet a growing need, the National Committee for Bioethics in Health of Mozambique (CNBS) encouraged the development of ethical review processes at ...
Jahit Sacarlal +9 more
doaj +2 more sources
The Challenge of Timely, Responsive and Rigorous Ethics Review of Disaster Research: Views of Research Ethics Committee Members. [PDF]
PLoS ONE, 2016 Research conducted following natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods or hurricanes is crucial for improving relief interventions. Such research, however, poses ethical, methodological and logistical challenges for researchers. Oversight of disaster
Matthew Hunt +6 more
doaj +2 more sources
Analysis of Animal Research Ethics Committee Membership at American Institutions
Animals, 2012 Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs) were created to review, approve and oversee animal experiments and to balance the interests of researchers, animals, institutions and the general public.
Alka Chandna +2 more
doaj +2 more sources
Decision Letters from a Kyrgyz Research Ethics Committee (2018-2022): An Empirical Review of Transparency, Rigor, and Communication. [PDF]
J Empir Res Hum Res EthicsKudaibergenova T, Jain N.
europepmc +2 more sources
"Ethics Committee Approval and Participant Consent Were Not Required": Challenging a Persistent Misconception in Biomedical Research. [PDF]
Indian J Psychol MedBipeta R.
europepmc +2 more sources
Experiences of research ethics committee members and scientists of the research protocol review process in Uganda: a case study. [PDF]
Int Health, 2020 Ssali A, Poland F, Seeley J.
europepmc +2 more sources
From "a Fair Game" to "a Form of Covert Research": Research Ethics Committee Members' Differing Notions of Consent and Potential Risk to Participants Within Social Media Research. [PDF]
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 2018 Hibbin RA, Samuel G, Derrick GE.
europepmc +2 more sources
Race in health research: Considerations for researchers and research ethics committees
South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, 2023 This article provides ethical guidance on using race in health research as a variable or in defining the study population. To this end, a plain, non-exhaustive checklist is provided for researchers and research ethics committees, preceded by a brief ...
W Van Staden +21 more
doaj +1 more source