Results 1 to 10 of about 1,873,859 (237)
Thank You to Our 2021 Reviewers
Radio Science, 2022 As 2021 draws to a close I suspect few of us could have foreseen the past year. In the early part of the year, as COVID-19 vaccination gathered pace, like many, I was hopeful that we would be seeing coronavirus in the rear-view mirror by the end of the ...
Sana Salous, Kazuya Kobayashi
exaly +3 more sources
Journal of the National Cancer InstituteTeaching/Communication/Extension/Profession,
Anonymous
exaly +5 more sources
Reviews, reviewers and reviewing [PDF]
International Orthopaedics, 2016 n ...
Zazgyva, Ancuţa +4 more
openaire +4 more sources
Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Metals in 2013
Metals, 2014 The editors of Metals would like to express their sincere gratitude to the following reviewers for assessing manuscripts in 2013.
Metals Editorial Office
doaj +1 more source
Reviews, reviews, reviews [PDF]
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2016 Deputy Editor‐in‐Chief, Dr Patrick Chien, discusses his top articles from this issue in an audio podcast available at: https://soundcloud.com/bjog/january-editors-choice ...
openaire +2 more sources
Science, 2008 Peer review, in which experts in the field scrutinize and critique scientific results prior to publication, is fundamental to scientific progress, and the achievements of science in the last century are an endorsement of its value. Peer review influences more than just science.
Bruce, Alberts +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
The Miracle of Peer Review and Development in Science: An Agent-Based Model [PDF]
, 2016 It is not easy to rationalize how peer review, as the current grassroots of science, can work based on voluntary contributions of reviewers. There is no rationale to write impartial and thorough evaluations.
Righi, Simone, Takács, Károly
core +5 more sources