Results 11 to 20 of about 1,039,949 (281)
Science, 2014 Anna Kaatz was working on a Ph.D. in comparative literature, studying old medical texts and public health codes, when her major professor was jailed and fired for sending sexually explicit material to a detective posing as a minor.
Gray, Anthony
openaire +4 more sources
, 2013 Health, Exercise, and Sports Sciences Reviewers' Report for Academic Program ReviewHealth, Exercise, and Sports Sciences, Reviewers' Report, Academic Program ReviewHealth, Exercise, and Sports Sciences Reviewers' Report Academic Program ...
HESS, APR +2 more
core +8 more sources
Reviews, reviewers and reviewing [PDF]
International Orthopaedics, 2016 n ...
Zazgyva, Ancuţa +4 more
openaire +4 more sources
Reviews, reviews, reviews [PDF]
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2016 Deputy Editor‐in‐Chief, Dr Patrick Chien, discusses his top articles from this issue in an audio podcast available at: https://soundcloud.com/bjog/january-editors-choice ...
openaire +2 more sources
Literature Reviews in HCI: A Review of Reviews
Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2023 This paper analyses Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) literature reviews to provide a clear conceptual basis for authors, reviewers, and readers. HCI is multidisciplinary and various types of literature reviews exist, from systematic to critical reviews in the style of essays.
Evropi Stefanidi +8 more
openaire +3 more sources
Review the ‘peer review’ [PDF]
Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2017 Peer review has been the main form of appraisal of scientific knowledge for over a century. In essence, this process involves the evaluation of a scientific finding by independent experts prior to its dissemination to the scientific community, in an attempt to ensure that both the research and conclusions meet the necessary standards regarding quality,
Blockeel, Christophe +4 more
openaire +3 more sources
Acknowledgment of Reviewers [PDF]
, 2012 It is with great appreciation that we acknowledge the following reviewers who have served our research community by reviewing manuscripts for Nutrients in 2011.
Peter Howe, Howe, Peter
core +1 more source
Computational Linguistics, 2005 I just returned from the Association for Computational Linguistics’ 43rd Annual Meeting (ACL-2005). The acceptance rate was 18%. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? When the acceptance rate is low, precision tends to be high. The audience can judge precision for itself. If the presentations are good, everyone knows it.
openaire +2 more sources