Results 1 to 10 of about 17,843,832 (369)

Diverse reviews

Hermes, 2017
No abstracts.
Diverse Reviews
doaj   +11 more sources

Book Reviews

Studi Slavistici, 2020
Book ...
Reviews
doaj   +1 more source

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

British medical journal, 2020
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past
M. Page, J. McKenzie, P. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T. Hoffmann, C. Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, J. Tetzlaff, E. Akl, S. Brennan, R. Chou, Julie May Glanville, J. Grimshaw, A. Hrõbjartsson, M. Lalu, Tianjing Li, E. Loder, E. Mayo-Wilson, Steve McDonald, L. McGuinness, L. Stewart, James Thomas, A. Tricco, V. Welch, P. Whiting, D. Moher   +25 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews

British medical journal, 2020
The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings.
M. Page, D. Moher, P. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T. Hoffmann, C. Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, J. Tetzlaff, E. Akl, S. Brennan, R. Chou, Julie May Glanville, J. Grimshaw, A. Hrõbjartsson, M. Lalu, Tianjing Li, E. Loder, E. Mayo-Wilson, Steve McDonald, L. McGuinness, L. Stewart, James Thomas, A. Tricco, V. Welch, P. Whiting, J. McKenzie   +25 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

PLoS Medicine, 2021
Matthew Page and co-authors describe PRISMA 2020, an updated reporting guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
M. Page, J. McKenzie, P. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T. Hoffmann, C. Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, J. Tetzlaff, E. Akl, S. Brennan, R. Chou, Julie May Glanville, J. Grimshaw, A. Hrõbjartsson, M. Lalu, Tianjing Li, E. Loder, E. Mayo-Wilson, Steve McDonald, L. McGuinness, L. Stewart, James Thomas, A. Tricco, V. Welch, P. Whiting, D. Moher   +25 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews

JBI Evidence Synthesis, 2020
Objective: The objective of this paper is to describe the updated methodological guidance for conducting a JBI scoping review, with a focus on new updates to the approach and development of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta ...
M. Peters, Casey Marnie, A. Tricco, D. Pollock, Z. Munn, Lyndsay Alexander, P. McInerney, C. Godfrey, H. Khalil   +8 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement

British medical journal, 2009
David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta ...
D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. Altman   +3 more
semanticscholar   +2 more sources

The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration

British medical journal, 2009
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarise evidence relating to efficacy and safety of healthcare interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, are not optimal.
A. Liberati, D. Altman, J. Tetzlaff, C. Mulrow, P. Gøtzsche, J. Ioannidis, Mike Clarke, Mike Clarke, P. Devereaux, J. Kleijnen, D. Moher   +10 more
semanticscholar   +2 more sources

Review Section

Review of Irish Studies in Europe, 2017
   
. Reviews
doaj   +1 more source

PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

Annals of Internal Medicine, 2018
Scoping reviews can be conducted to meet various objectives. They may examine the extent (that is, size), range (variety), and nature (characteristics) of the evidence on a topic or question; determine the value of undertaking a systematic review ...
A. Tricco, Erin Lillie, W. Zarin, K. O’Brien, H. Colquhoun, D. Levac, D. Moher, M. Peters, T. Horsley, L. Weeks, S. Hempel, E. Akl, Christine Chang, J. McGowan, L. Stewart, L. Hartling, Adrian Aldcroft, Michael Wilson, C. Garritty, S. Lewin, C. Godfrey, M. Macdonald, Etienne V. Langlois, K. Soares-Weiser, J. Moriarty, T. Clifford, zge Tunalp, S. Straus   +27 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source