Results 1 to 10 of about 14,475,028 (324)
Reviews, reviewers and reviewing [PDF]
n ...
Zazgyva, Ancuţa +4 more
openaire +4 more sources
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Matthew Page and co-authors describe PRISMA 2020, an updated reporting guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
M. Page +25 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings.
M. Page +25 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews
Objective: The objective of this paper is to describe the updated methodological guidance for conducting a JBI scoping review, with a focus on new updates to the approach and development of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta ...
M. Peters +8 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarise evidence relating to efficacy and safety of healthcare interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, are not optimal.
A. Liberati +10 more
semanticscholar +2 more sources
Reviews, reviews, reviews [PDF]
Deputy Editor‐in‐Chief, Dr Patrick Chien, discusses his top articles from this issue in an audio podcast available at: https://soundcloud.com/bjog/january-editors-choice ...
openaire +2 more sources
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
Scoping reviews can be conducted to meet various objectives. They may examine the extent (that is, size), range (variety), and nature (characteristics) of the evidence on a topic or question; determine the value of undertaking a systematic review ...
A. Tricco +27 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Background: Literature searches underlie the foundations of systematic reviews and related review types. Yet, the literature searching component of systematic reviews and related review types is often poorly reported.
M. Rethlefsen +6 more
semanticscholar +2 more sources

