Results 11 to 20 of about 8,814,223 (344)
Research Involvement and Engagement, 2021 Plain English summary We conducted a study exploring how patients could be involved in improving services using health data. This paper reports on the evaluation of that study.
Sarah E. Knowles +9 more
doaj +1 more source
Systematic Reviews, 2020 Background Systematic reviews of medical devices are particularly challenging as the quality of evidence tends to be more limited than evidence on pharmaceutical products.
Ros Wade +6 more
doaj +1 more source
Health Technology Assessment, 2020 Background: There have been no licensed treatment options in the UK for treating thrombocytopenia in people with chronic liver disease requiring surgery.
Nigel Armstrong +15 more
doaj +1 more source
ColluEagle: Collusive review spammer detection using Markov random fields [PDF]
Data mining and knowledge discovery, 2020, 34(6): 1621-1641, 2019 Product reviews are extremely valuable for online shoppers in providing purchase decisions. Driven by immense profit incentives, fraudsters deliberately fabricate untruthful reviews to distort the reputation of online products. As online reviews become more and more important, group spamming, i.e., a team of fraudsters working collaboratively to attack
arxiv +1 more source
Identifying Hijacked Reviews [PDF]
, 2021 Fake reviews and review manipulation are growing problems on online marketplaces globally. Review Hijacking is a new review manipulation tactic in which unethical sellers "hijack" an existing product page (usually one with many positive reviews), then update the product details like title, photo, and description with those of an entirely different ...
arxiv +1 more source
Auctions and Peer Prediction for Academic Peer Review [PDF]
arXiv, 2021 Peer reviewed publications are considered the gold standard in certifying and disseminating ideas that a research community considers valuable. However, we identify two major drawbacks of the current system: (1) the overwhelming demand for reviewers due to a large volume of submissions, and (2) the lack of incentives for reviewers to participate and ...
arxiv