Results 11 to 20 of about 17,843,832 (369)

Reviews [PDF]

open access: yesHistorical Studies, 1939
Review of Dating Techniques for the Archaeologist, by Henry N. Michael and Elizabeth K. Ralph (eds.); Explanation in Archaeology, by Patty Jo Watson, Steven A LeBlanc, and Charles Redman; Frozen Tombs of Siberia, by Sergei I. Rudenko; The Early History of Korea, by K. J. H.
Morgenstein, Maury   +24 more
openaire   +1 more source

Reviews, reviewers and reviewing [PDF]

open access: yesInternational Orthopaedics, 2016
n ...
Zazgyva, Ancuţa   +4 more
openaire   +4 more sources

More than a method: trusting relationships, productive tensions, and two-way learning as mechanisms of authentic co-production

open access: yesResearch Involvement and Engagement, 2021
Plain English summary We conducted a study exploring how patients could be involved in improving services using health data. This paper reports on the evaluation of that study.
Sarah E. Knowles   +9 more
doaj   +1 more source

AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both

open access: yesBritish medical journal, 2017
The number of published systematic reviews of studies of healthcare interventions has increased rapidly and these are used extensively for clinical and policy decisions.
B. Shea   +10 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews

open access: yesSystematic Reviews, 2016
BackgroundSynthesis of multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in a systematic review can summarize the effects of individual outcomes and provide numerical answers about the effectiveness of interventions.
M. Ouzzani   +3 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down? Semantic Orientation Applied to Unsupervised Classification of Reviews [PDF]

open access: yesAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2002
This paper presents a simple unsupervised learning algorithm for classifying reviews as recommended (thumbs up) or not recommended (thumbs down). The classification of a review is predicted by the average semantic orientation of the phrases in the review
Peter D. Turney
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline

open access: yesBritish medical journal, 2020
In systematic reviews that lack data amenable to meta-analysis, alternative synthesis methods are commonly used, but these methods are rarely reported. This lack of transparency in the methods can cast doubt on the validity of the review findings.
M. Campbell   +11 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy