Results 11 to 20 of about 14,475,028 (324)

Book reviews [PDF]

, 2002
Alison Aughinbaugh, Deborah Figart, Peter L. Danner   +2 more
semanticscholar   +6 more sources

Review Section

Review of Irish Studies in Europe, 2017
   
. Reviews
doaj   +1 more source

Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down? Semantic Orientation Applied to Unsupervised Classification of Reviews [PDF]

Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2002
This paper presents a simple unsupervised learning algorithm for classifying reviews as recommended (thumbs up) or not recommended (thumbs down). The classification of a review is predicted by the average semantic orientation of the phrases in the review
Peter D. Turney
semanticscholar   +1 more source

AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both

British medical journal, 2017
The number of published systematic reviews of studies of healthcare interventions has increased rapidly and these are used extensively for clinical and policy decisions.
B. Shea, Barnaby C Reeves, George Wells, Micere Thuku, Candyce Hamel, Julian Moran, D. Moher, P. Tugwell, Vivian Welch, Elizabeth Kristjansson, David A Henry   +10 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews.

JBI Evidence Synthesis, 2022
Scoping reviewers often face challenges in the extraction, analysis, and presentation of scoping review results. Using best-practice examples and drawing on the expertise of the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group and an editor of a journal that ...
D. Pollock, Micah D J Peters, H. Khalil, P. McInerney, Lyndsay Alexander, A. Tricco, C. Evans, Érica Brandão de Moraes, C. Godfrey, D. Pieper, Ashrita Saran, Cindy Stern, Z. Munn   +12 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline

British medical journal, 2020
In systematic reviews that lack data amenable to meta-analysis, alternative synthesis methods are commonly used, but these methods are rarely reported. This lack of transparency in the methods can cast doubt on the validity of the review findings.
M. Campbell, J. McKenzie, A. Sowden, S. Katikireddi, S. Brennan, S. Ellis, Jamie Hartmann-Boyce, Rebecca Ryan, S. Shepperd, James Thomas, V. Welch, H. Thomson   +11 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Reviewing Peer Review [PDF]

Science, 2008
Peer review, in which experts in the field scrutinize and critique scientific results prior to publication, is fundamental to scientific progress, and the achievements of science in the last century are an endorsement of its value. Peer review influences more than just science.
Bruce, Alberts, Brooks, Hanson, Katrina L, Kelner   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews

Systematic Reviews, 2016
BackgroundSynthesis of multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in a systematic review can summarize the effects of individual outcomes and provide numerical answers about the effectiveness of interventions.
M. Ouzzani, Hossam M. Hammady, Z. Fedorowicz, A. Elmagarmid   +3 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

International Coaching Psychology Review, 2010
The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions is the official document that describes in detail the process of preparing and maintaining Cochrane systematic reviews on the effects of healthcare interventions.
Julian P T Higgins, Sally Green
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement

British medical journal, 2009
David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta ...
D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. Altman   +3 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source