Results 21 to 30 of about 14,475,028 (324)

Methods for selecting the best evidence to inform a NICE technology appraisal on selective internal radiation therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma

open access: yesSystematic Reviews, 2020
Background Systematic reviews of medical devices are particularly challenging as the quality of evidence tends to be more limited than evidence on pharmaceutical products.
Ros Wade   +6 more
doaj   +1 more source

Diverse reviews

open access: yesHermes, 1999
g
- Diverse reviews
doaj   +1 more source

More than a method: trusting relationships, productive tensions, and two-way learning as mechanisms of authentic co-production

open access: yesResearch Involvement and Engagement, 2021
Plain English summary We conducted a study exploring how patients could be involved in improving services using health data. This paper reports on the evaluation of that study.
Sarah E. Knowles   +9 more
doaj   +1 more source

Avatrombopag and lusutrombopag for thrombocytopenia in people with chronic liver disease needing an elective procedure: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis

open access: yesHealth Technology Assessment, 2020
Background: There have been no licensed treatment options in the UK for treating thrombocytopenia in people with chronic liver disease requiring surgery.
Nigel Armstrong   +15 more
doaj   +1 more source

Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement.

open access: yesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2020
OBJECTIVES To describe the processes used to update the PRISMA 2009 statement for reporting systematic reviews, present results of a survey conducted to inform the update, summarise decisions made at the PRISMA update meeting, and describe and justify ...
M. Page   +8 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family

open access: yesSystematic Reviews, 2023
Scoping reviews, mapping reviews, and evidence and gap maps are evidence synthesis methodologies that address broad research questions, aiming to describe a bigger picture rather than address a specific question about intervention effectiveness. They are
Fiona Campbell   +7 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice

open access: yesReviews of Management Sciences, 2022
Review articles or literature reviews are a critical part of scientific research. While numerous guides on literature reviews exist, these are often limited to the philosophy of review procedures, protocols, and nomenclatures, triggering non-parsimonious
S. Kraus   +14 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

The effectiveness of ablative and non‐surgical therapies for early hepatocellular carcinoma: Systematic review and network meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials

open access: yesCancer Medicine, 2023
Background & Aims Non‐surgical therapies are frequently used for patients with early or very early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this systematic review and network meta‐analysis (NMA) was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of ablative
Emily South   +11 more
doaj   +1 more source

Transverse energy and charged particle multiplicity at various centralities at RHIC: Statistical model estimates

open access: yes, 2005
The transverse energy and the charged particle multiplicity at midrapidity are evaluated in a single-freeze-out model for different centrality bins at RHIC at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=130$ and 200 GeV.
Adams)   +14 more
core   +1 more source

Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement

open access: yesBritish medical journal, 2022
Objective To develop a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions. Design Development of the preferred reporting items for overviews of reviews (PRIOR) statement.
M. Gates   +19 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy