Results 191 to 200 of about 29,582 (244)
Salvage re-revision total hip arthroplasty for severe femoral and acetabular bone defect complicated by periprosthetic joint infection and stem loosening: insights from geriatric orthopedics. [PDF]
J Surg Case RepVu DA +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1982In this review, 110 hips in 107 patients underwent revision total hip arthroplasty at The Hospital for Special Surgery and the Robert B. Brigham Hospital. The minimum follow-up period was two years (average, 3.4 years). Failures of the original total hip arthroplasties were due to loosening of the femoral component (44 hips), loosening of both ...
P M, Pellicci +5 more
openaire +3 more sources
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
AORN Journal, 2002ABSTRACTEndoscopic visualization and pneumatically‐powered ballistic chisels that can be used to remove cement and cementless prostheses are recent developmental improvements for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Use of these new tools facilitates the revision procedure, reduces tissue trauma, and may reduce surgical time.
Cynthia, Drake +2 more
openaire +3 more sources
The results of revision of total hip arthroplasty
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1979The results of 140 total hip revision procedures for "non-septic" loosening, dislocation, and fracture of the femoral stem or shaft have been personally reviewed and rated by the Harris method. The minimum follow-up period was six months: thirty-three (24 per cent) showed excellent or good results, seventy-two (51 per cent) showed fair or poor results.
G A, Hunter +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 2006We evaluated a consecutive series of patients followed for at least 1 year after revision total hip arthroplasty. We surveyed 488 patients treated at three referral centers from 1998 to 2002. An experienced medical interviewer contacted patients and rated their degree of satisfaction with the original and revision arthroplasties, the reason of original
Robert L, Barrack +5 more
openaire +2 more sources
Revision of Mueller Total Hip Arthroplasties
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1981Experience with 65 revisions of Mueller total hip arthroplasties and a minimum of two years follow-up on 32 revised total hips showed that the results appear to be poor in a significant number (22%) of patients: 18% required additional surgery. Revision of total hip arthroplasties with recementing of one or both components carries a significant risk of
T, Hoogland +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Revision of Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1986Extension of infection down the medulla of the femur to the supracondylar region may occur in cases of chronic infected total hip arthroplasty. Because this cannot always be identified before operation, the femur should be reamed and flushed proximally from the lateral condyle in all cases where there is suspicion of infection around the femoral ...
F A, Weber, E E, Lautenbach
openaire +2 more sources
Revision total hip arthroplasty.
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 1985Two hundred and ten hips in 206 patients who had an initial total hip arthroplasty performed at the Mayo Clinic between 1969 and 1978 required revision of the arthroplasty at the Mayo Clinic for reasons other than infection. One hundred and sixty-two of the patients (166 hips) were followed both clinically and roentgenographically for two years or more.
B F, Kavanagh +2 more
openaire +2 more sources