Results 211 to 220 of about 29,582 (244)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Block allografts in revision total hip arthroplasty
The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2002We report on 61 consecutive cemented acetabular revisions in which block allografts were used to reconstruct large defects. After a mean follow-up of 6.5 years, we observed satisfactory results when grafts had been rigidly fixed. Additional buttress-plates can improve the outcome. Paprosky type 3B defects had a double risk of failure. Cup migration had
J F A, Somers +4 more
openaire +2 more sources
Femoral Component Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasty
Orthopedics, 2016Modern primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is among the most successful operations in medicine. It has been a consistently effective treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis of the hip. With the increasing number of primary THA procedures being performed and the decreasing age of patients undergoing the procedure, there is an inevitable ...
Jonathon M, Brown +6 more
openaire +2 more sources
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Femoral Component
Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1995The initial results with cemented femoral revision stems were disappointing, with high early loosening rates. The application of second-generation cementing techniques improved results markedly, with loosening rates of 10% at 10 years in a number of series.
, Barrack, , Folgueras
openaire +2 more sources
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 2003Revision total hip arthroplasty is a complex surgical procedure that frequently requires high levels of hospital resources. The purpose of the current study was to report the actual costs and reimbursement to the hospital for a stratified group of patients having revision total hip arthroplasty based on a severity index.
John F, Crowe +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Revision of Aseptic Loose Total Hip Arthroplasties
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1982Sixty-six patients were revised for aseptic loosening of their conventional hip arthroplasties; follow-up periods ranged from one to nine years. In comparing them with an overall conventional arthroplasty series, there was a higher failure rate with dysplasia and post-traumatic patients, and a lower incidence in osteoarthritic and rheumatoid patients ...
H C, Amstutz +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Acetabular Component
Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1995Intermediate and long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty performed with the use of a cemented acetabular component have been disappointing, with high rates of radiographic and clinical failure. Other methods of acetabular revision involving the use of threaded cups and bipolar implants have also met with high failure rates.
, Petrera, , Rubash
openaire +2 more sources
Modular Revision Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2004Many different clinical circumstances are seen in revision total hip arthroplasty. Modular stems provide significant flexibility in choices to ensure distal and/or proximal unitary construct of implant and host bone. There are two basic types of modular stems.
openaire +2 more sources
Current trends in revision of total hip arthroplasty
International Orthopaedics, 1984Total hip arthroplasty has brought pain relief and mobility to many patients, but load bearing implants may fail and the resulting problems must be tackled early and with vigour. The primary operation offers the best chance of success, and revision may only ever be considered a salvage procedure.
openaire +2 more sources
Revision total hip arthroplasty
The Journal of Arthroplasty, 1993James C. Zmolek, Lawrence D. Dorr
openaire +2 more sources