Results 41 to 50 of about 628 (156)
Which/r/Are you Using as an English Teacher? Rhotic or Non-Rhotic?
AbstractThere are many obvious differences between North American English (NAE) and British English (BrE)/r/phoneme, and a great majority of Turkish English teachers do not know which variant of the/r/they are using. It must be noted that such a case easily confuses the students. The articulation and production of North American English-r is ambiguous.
openaire +2 more sources
Supporting Literacy Through the Justice and Dialogic Education (JADE) Framework
Justice and Dialogic Education (JADE) Framework: Stances, Value Orientations, and Pedagogical Dispositions. ABSTRACT This paper introduces the Justice and Dialogic Education (JADE) framework, which integrates dialogic instruction with justice‐oriented pedagogies to foster transformative classroom environments.
Rebecca Lee, Shireen Al‐Adeimi
wiley +1 more source
Hybrid Clause Combining Strategies in Turkish Language Contacts
Abstract The Turkic contact varieties of the Balkans use two main diametrically opposed subordination strategies: (i) the Turkic template, where typical subordinate clauses are prepositive, nonfinite, contain clause‐final subordinators, etc. and (ii) the Indo‐European (IE) template, where typical subordinate clauses are postpositive, finite, contain ...
Cem Keskin +3 more
wiley +1 more source
Removing the Disguise: The Matched Guise Technique, Incongruity, and Listener Awareness
ABSTRACT Sociophonetic perception is often studied using versions of the matched guise technique (MGT). Linguists using this technique appear united in the methodological assumptions that participants believe the manipulation and that this belief influences perception below the level of introspective awareness.
Kyler Laycock, Kevin B. McGowan
wiley +1 more source
Investigating rhoticity in Scottish Standard English with sociolinguistic interviews and corpus data
Abstract This paper approaches variable rhoticity in Scottish Standard English (SSE) from a methodological, data‐oriented perspective. The main focus is on how to integrate within a single sociolinguistic framework data that have been elicited under different conditions (sociolinguistic interviews vs. corpus data) and may therefore be incompatible when
Ole Schützler
wiley +1 more source
Testing sociolinguistic theory and methods in world Englishes
Abstract This article assesses mainstream sociolinguistic theory and methods in the context of world Englishes. Despite its obvious applicability, sociolinguistic theory has not always been the primary analytic model for world Englishes. The multilingual and sometimes mobile circumstances of world Englishes contexts do not always fit the usual ...
Devyani Sharma
wiley +1 more source
World Englishes and sociolinguistic variation
Abstract This article discusses the connections between world Englishes and sociolinguistic variation. It begins with an overview of the field of sociolinguistic variation, and also highlighting contemporary approaches to world Englishes, with specific reference to the sociolinguistic realities (in the Kachruvian sense) of Outer Circle contexts.
Werner Botha, Tobias Bernaisch
wiley +1 more source
Rhotics and rhoticity in Scotland : a sociophonetic study of Standard Scottish English
Cette thèse en sociophonétique anglaise combine les approches de la sociolinguistique variationniste et de la phonétique expérimentale pour étudier les rhotiques et la rhoticité en Écosse en anglais écossais standard. Grâce aux analyses auditives de 147 locuteurs écossais et aux analyses acoustiques fines de locuteurs de Dundee et de Kinross, l'extrême
openaire +3 more sources
Language and identity in the Windrush generation
Abstract This paper examines how the Windrush generation uses phonological and morphosyntactic elements of Jamaican Creole (JamC), London Jamaican (LonJam) and standard British English (SBE) to do identity work in interviews broadcast as part of a celebration of the 75th anniversary of the arrival of HMT Empire Windrush.
Guyanne Wilson
wiley +1 more source
Abstract Background Speech in individuals with cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) is a complex myriad of presenting symptoms. It is uniquely associated with the structural difference of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI), together with a wide and heterogeneous range of other aetiologies which often co‐occur.
Valerie J Pereira, Debbie Sell
wiley +1 more source

