Results 11 to 20 of about 1,531,874 (315)

The Impact on Systematic Reviews of Risk of Bias Assessment Changes From Conference Abstracts to Full Text [PDF]

open access: yesCochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods
Conference abstracts are commonly included in systematic reviews of evidence. Due to limitations in word count, conference abstracts often lack data or information. This causes issues for the assessment of risk of bias (RoB).
Ryan P. W. Kenny   +4 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Risk of bias

open access: yesBritish Journal of Surgery, 2022
(A): Risk of bias graph indicating the review authors’ rating regarding the risk of bias, presented as percentages, across all of the included studies; (B):Risk of bias summary indicating the review authors’ judgments on each risk of bias item for each ...
Jonas Ranstam, Jonathan A Cook
openaire   +3 more sources

Human Versus Artificial Intelligence: Comparing Cochrane Authors' and ChatGPT's Risk of Bias Assessments [PDF]

open access: yesCochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods
Introduction Systematic reviews and meta‐analyses synthesize randomized trial data to guide clinical decisions but require significant time and resources.
Petek Eylul Taneri
doaj   +2 more sources

Change over Five Years in Important Measures of Methodological Quality and Reporting in Randomized Cardiovascular Clinical Trials

open access: yesJournal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 2023
Objectives: The aim of our current study was to analyze whether the use of important measures of methodological quality and reporting of randomized clinical trials published in the field of cardiovascular disease research haschanged over time.
Odgerel Baasan   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

What Quality Assessment Tool Should I Use? A Practical Guide for Systematic Reviews Authors [PDF]

open access: yesIranian Journal of Medical Sciences, 2023
The rapid growth in medical research has popularized systematic reviews as comprehensive, accurate, reliable, and concise summaries of the best available information on a particular topic.
Somayeh Delavari   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Assessing the risk of performance and detection bias in Cochrane reviews as a joint domain is less accurate compared to two separate domains

open access: yesBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2021
Background Initially, the Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) tool had a domain for “blinding of participants, personnel and outcome assessors”. In the 2011 tool, the assessment of blinding was split into two domains: blinding of participants and personnel ...
Ognjen Barcot   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Assessment of Risk of Bias in Osteosarcoma and Ewing’s Sarcoma Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review

open access: yesCurrent Oncology, 2021
Aim: The aim of this study was to systematically assess the risk of bias in osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma (ES) randomized controlled trials (RCT) and to examine the relationships between bias and conflict of interest/industry sponsorship.
Robert Koucheki   +6 more
doaj   +1 more source

What tool do undergraduate pharmacy students prefer when grading systematic review evidence: AMSTAR‐2 or ROBIS?

open access: yesCochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods, 2023
Introduction While systematic reviews (SRs) are considered the highest form of evidence in the hierarchy, the quality and standard of reviews varies. Two quality assessment tools have been developed to assess the variation in such standards.
Shaun W. H. Lee
doaj   +1 more source

Methodological Quality and Risk of Bias Assessment of Cardiovascular Disease Research: Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in 2017

open access: yesFrontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2022
BackgroundAll randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) are required to follow high methodological standards. In this study, we aimed to assess the methodological quality of published cardiovascular clinical research trials in a representative sample of RCTs ...
Odgerel Baasan   +6 more
doaj   +1 more source

5G New Radio Requires the Best Possible Risk Assessment Studies: Perspective and Recommended Guidelines

open access: yesFrontiers in Communications and Networks, 2021
The development and establishment of mobile communication technologies has necessitated assessments of possible risks to human health from exposures to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields (RF EMF).
Mats-Olof Mattsson   +4 more
doaj   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy