Results 11 to 20 of about 1,531,874 (315)
The Impact on Systematic Reviews of Risk of Bias Assessment Changes From Conference Abstracts to Full Text [PDF]
Conference abstracts are commonly included in systematic reviews of evidence. Due to limitations in word count, conference abstracts often lack data or information. This causes issues for the assessment of risk of bias (RoB).
Ryan P. W. Kenny +4 more
doaj +2 more sources
(A): Risk of bias graph indicating the review authors’ rating regarding the risk of bias, presented as percentages, across all of the included studies; (B):Risk of bias summary indicating the review authors’ judgments on each risk of bias item for each ...
Jonas Ranstam, Jonathan A Cook
openaire +3 more sources
Human Versus Artificial Intelligence: Comparing Cochrane Authors' and ChatGPT's Risk of Bias Assessments [PDF]
Introduction Systematic reviews and meta‐analyses synthesize randomized trial data to guide clinical decisions but require significant time and resources.
Petek Eylul Taneri
doaj +2 more sources
Objectives: The aim of our current study was to analyze whether the use of important measures of methodological quality and reporting of randomized clinical trials published in the field of cardiovascular disease research haschanged over time.
Odgerel Baasan +3 more
doaj +1 more source
What Quality Assessment Tool Should I Use? A Practical Guide for Systematic Reviews Authors [PDF]
The rapid growth in medical research has popularized systematic reviews as comprehensive, accurate, reliable, and concise summaries of the best available information on a particular topic.
Somayeh Delavari +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Background Initially, the Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) tool had a domain for “blinding of participants, personnel and outcome assessors”. In the 2011 tool, the assessment of blinding was split into two domains: blinding of participants and personnel ...
Ognjen Barcot +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Aim: The aim of this study was to systematically assess the risk of bias in osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma (ES) randomized controlled trials (RCT) and to examine the relationships between bias and conflict of interest/industry sponsorship.
Robert Koucheki +6 more
doaj +1 more source
Introduction While systematic reviews (SRs) are considered the highest form of evidence in the hierarchy, the quality and standard of reviews varies. Two quality assessment tools have been developed to assess the variation in such standards.
Shaun W. H. Lee
doaj +1 more source
BackgroundAll randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) are required to follow high methodological standards. In this study, we aimed to assess the methodological quality of published cardiovascular clinical research trials in a representative sample of RCTs ...
Odgerel Baasan +6 more
doaj +1 more source
The development and establishment of mobile communication technologies has necessitated assessments of possible risks to human health from exposures to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields (RF EMF).
Mats-Olof Mattsson +4 more
doaj +1 more source

