Results 21 to 30 of about 623,096 (312)

Scholarly Communication in Sociology [PDF]

open access: yesOpen Sociology, 2019
Scholarly publishing takes place in an institutional arena that is opaque to its practitioners. As readers, writers, reviewers, and editors, we have no clear view of the system within which we’re working. Researchers starting their careers receive (if they’re lucky) folk wisdom and mythology handed down from advisor to advisee, geared more toward ...
openaire   +2 more sources

Community Governance In Scholarly Communication

open access: yes, 2022
This work was funded by Arcadia, a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin. Additional information about how our work is funded can be found here: https://investinopen.org/about/how-were-funded/
openaire   +1 more source

Recent developments in scholarly communication: a review [PDF]

open access: yes, 2015
This review article on recent developments in scholarly communication focuses on the content of three 2013 publications: The future of scholarly communication, edited by Deborah Shorley; Debating open access, edited by Nigel Vincent and Chris Wickham ...
Steele, Colin
core   +1 more source

Starting from the End: What to do when Restricted Data is released

open access: yesData Science Journal, 2017
Repository managers can never be one hundred percent sure of the security of hosted research data. Even assuming that human errors and technical faults will never happen, repositories can be subject to hacking attacks.
Marta Teperek   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Library Publishing is Special: Selection and Eligibility in Library Publishing

open access: yesJournal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2014
Traditional publishing is based on ownership, commerce, paid exchanges, and scholarship as a commodity, while library activities are based on a service model of sharing resources and free exchange.
Paul Royster
doaj   +2 more sources

Humanities: The Outlier of Research Assessments

open access: yesInformation, 2020
Commercial bibliometric databases, and the quantitative indicators presented by them, are widely used for research assessment purposes, which is not fair for the humanities.
Güleda Doğan, Zehra Taşkın
doaj   +1 more source

Foxes Propose New Guidelines for Henhouse Design: Comments on NISO’s Proposed Open Access Metadata Standards

open access: yesJournal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2014
This commentary is in response to: NISO RP-22-201x, Open Access Metadata and Indicators (draft for comment), which is available at: http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/document.php?document_id ...
Paul Royster
doaj   +2 more sources

Communication floods – Emails in scholarly communication

open access: yesStudies in Communication, Media, 2020
The aim of this study is to display the current email usage among academics and the email‘s influence on the field of science by analyzing qualitative interviews and media diaries with 55 German-speaking academics.
Corinna Lüthje, Franziska Thiele
doaj   +1 more source

E-preprint and Scholarly Communication [PDF]

open access: yesJournal of Library and Information Studies, 2003
The communication channels and information flow have been significantly changed in the past decades even though the essence of scholarly communication pretty much stays the same.
Wen-Yau Cathy Lin
doaj   +1 more source

FDup: a framework for general-purpose and efficient entity deduplication of record collections [PDF]

open access: yesPeerJ Computer Science, 2022
Deduplication is a technique aiming at identifying and resolving duplicate metadata records in a collection. This article describes FDup (Flat Collections Deduper), a general-purpose software framework supporting a complete deduplication workflow to ...
Michele De Bonis   +2 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy