Results 251 to 260 of about 35,847,064 (286)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2021
This chapter takes a retrospective approach to the advances and contributions of regional science. It further argues that regional sciences are currently on the verge of a remarkable change resulting from the growing pressures, social, environmental, and economic felt in the Anthropocene.
openaire +1 more source
This chapter takes a retrospective approach to the advances and contributions of regional science. It further argues that regional sciences are currently on the verge of a remarkable change resulting from the growing pressures, social, environmental, and economic felt in the Anthropocene.
openaire +1 more source
The Web 2.0 revolution and the promise of Science 2.0
2013The term ‘Web 2.0’ was coined to refer to certain attributes that differentiated some of the most successful websites at the beginning of the twenty-first century from those that were less than successful. It gained widespread attention and has been adopted by individuals in organizations in many sectors.
openaire +1 more source
Collaborative writing in the context of science 2.0
Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Knowledge Technologies and Data-driven Business, 2015The increasing number of co-authored academic papers points to the importance of collaborative writing in contemporary research. Digital technologies add a new dimension to collaborative writing by providing co-authors with access to the same document and enabling co-authors to edit the shared text at the same time.
openaire +1 more source
2013
The successful integration of the cloud, open data and citizen science provides the opportunity for some of the most exciting breakthroughs in science. However, Web 2.0 ideas and technologies have not been universally embraced by the scientific community. This be may be ascribed to a number of reasons: a reluctance to change a system that has served so
openaire +1 more source
The successful integration of the cloud, open data and citizen science provides the opportunity for some of the most exciting breakthroughs in science. However, Web 2.0 ideas and technologies have not been universally embraced by the scientific community. This be may be ascribed to a number of reasons: a reluctance to change a system that has served so
openaire +1 more source
Science, 2008
B. Shneiderman's Perspective, “Science 2.0” (7 March, p. [1349][1]), is quite right to identify the value of new observations of human interaction made possible by the advent of the Internet. However, Shneiderman's assertion that these data require some radically new methodology, which he calls “Science 2.0,” is apparently based on a misunderstanding ...
openaire +1 more source
B. Shneiderman's Perspective, “Science 2.0” (7 March, p. [1349][1]), is quite right to identify the value of new observations of human interaction made possible by the advent of the Internet. However, Shneiderman's assertion that these data require some radically new methodology, which he calls “Science 2.0,” is apparently based on a misunderstanding ...
openaire +1 more source
Pseudo-Science—The Bane of Science
Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1963Roald N Grant, R N Grant
exaly
Science 2.0: Communicating Science Creatively
The Science Teacher, 2017Ben Smith, Jared Mader
openaire +1 more source

