Results 221 to 230 of about 1,256,119 (263)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Evaluation as Scientific Research
Evaluation Review, 1988Ideal characteristics of a well established area of scientific inquiry are parsimony, generality, coherence, uniqueness, clarity of boundaries, and potential for cumulative inquiry. The role of evaluation as grazing area for varied species of social science and the entrepreneurial environments of practice have led it to try to define itself by method ...
openaire +1 more source
Evaluating the Oversight of Scientific Misconduct
Accountability in Research, 2005The Office of Research Integrity has proposed a new definition of scientific misconduct that will substantively reduce the federal government's role of oversight of scientific practices. The standard is being changed despite the lack of evidence about the effects of current policies or understanding of why research misconduct occurs, how it can be ...
Barbara K, Redman, Jon F, Merz
openaire +2 more sources
Is interdisciplinary scientific research easily evaluable?
2012Research is increasingly divided into different scientific disciplines and this tends to lead to difficulties in associating knowledge from different specialized fields in projects of public usefulness such as for medical or OSH research. Is interdisciplinary scientific research easily evaluable?
André, Jean-Claude +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Scientific Decline: Is Quantitative Evaluation Enough?
Isis, 1984T HERE IS A STRONG TRADITION of declinist literature in the history of science, most of it focused on England and France in the nineteenth century. Charles Babbage's Reflections on the Decline of Science in England (1830) originated the tradition, registering a widespread feeling among English scientists that English science was in decline, especially ...
openaire +2 more sources
Evaluating Academic/Scientific Posters
2017This chapter looks at how we determine what makes a “good” poster, particularly from the perspective of formal assessment. It explores the limitations we face when trying to evaluate large amounts of posters and offers a range of solutions that can help the process.
openaire +1 more source
SCIENTIFIC EVALUATION OF COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
The Lancet, 1986T.J. Goulder, H.A. Bird
openaire +2 more sources
Evaluating Scientific Presentations
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1966openaire +1 more source