Results 51 to 60 of about 2,396,287 (305)

Key factors in transforming the results of the research and development into registered patents

open access: yesEkonomika Nauki, 2016
The article discusses a thesis of a project «Strategies for sci entific-technological development of Russian Federation up until 2035» according to which the low efficiency of the Russian scientific sector, technologies and innovations systems is ...
V. G. Zinov
doaj  

Scientists should stop deceiving us [PDF]

open access: yes, 2010
If scientists acknowledged the real, problematic aims of science which have, associated with them, problematic assumptions concerning metaphysics, values and the use of science, it would become clear the public should be involved in exploring questions ...
Maxwell, N
core  

Political Regimes, Bureaucracy, and Scientific Productivity [PDF]

open access: yes, 2008
Can a scientist trust that the government is going to pay him or her fairly? In the science–government relationship, an incumbent may be better off if he or she does not provide—or does not provide a fair pay to public scientists.
Lapuente Giné, Víctor   +1 more
core   +4 more sources

Adherence to Protocol Recommendations for Children With Wilms Tumour in Two Consecutive Studies in the United Kingdom and Ireland—Does Variation Matter?

open access: yesPediatric Blood &Cancer, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Background and Aims Wilms tumour (WT) has excellent event‐free and overall survival (OS). However, small differences exist between countries participating in the same international study. This led us to examine variation in adherence to protocol recommendations as a potential contributing factor.
Suzanne Tugnait   +23 more
wiley   +1 more source

The two cultures: Scientists and Journalists, not an outdated relationship

open access: yesMètode Science Studies Journal: Annual Review, 2014
The relationship between scientists and journalists is much better than its image would suggest. Scientists not only believe that public communication is a duty, but also that media visibility is beneficial.
Hans Peter Peters
doaj   +1 more source

Children's perceptions of scientists, and of themselves as scientists

open access: yesLUMAT, 2021
In rapidly developing countries such as the United Arab Emirates (UAE), where this study took place, having a body of competent, dedicated key workers in STEM fields is critical to growing national economies.
Martina Dickson   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Sirolimus for Extracranial Arteriovenous Malformations: A Scoping Review of the Evidence in Syndromic and Non‐Syndromic Cases

open access: yesPediatric Blood &Cancer, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are rare, high‐flow, vascular anomalies that can occur either sporadically or as part of a genetic syndrome. AVMs can progress with serious morbidity and even mortality if left unchecked. Sirolimus is an mTOR inhibitor that is effective in low‐flow vascular malformations; however, its role in AVMs is unclear.
Will Swansson   +3 more
wiley   +1 more source

The Scientist as Illustrator [PDF]

open access: yesTrends in Immunology, 2016
Proficiency in art and illustration was once considered an essential skill for biologists, because text alone often could not suffice to describe observations of biological systems. With modern imaging technology, it is no longer necessary to illustrate what we can see by eye.
openaire   +2 more sources

Evaluating the Utility of Paired Tumor and Germline Targeted DNA Sequencing for Pediatric Oncology Patients: A Single Institution Report

open access: yesPediatric Blood &Cancer, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the diagnostic yield and utility of universal paired tumor–normal multigene panel sequencing in newly diagnosed pediatric solid and central nervous system (CNS) tumor patients and to compare the detection of germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PV/LPVs) against established clinical referral criteria for cancer ...
Natalie Waligorski   +9 more
wiley   +1 more source

Ranking scientists

open access: yesNature Physics, 2015
Currently the ranking of scientists is based on the $h$-index, which is widely perceived as an imprecise and simplistic though still useful metric. We find that the $h$-index actually favours modestly performing researchers and propose a simple criterion for proper ranking.
Sergey N. Dorogovtsev   +1 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy