Results 201 to 210 of about 58,524 (233)

How we measure our impact. [PDF]

open access: yesPatterns (N Y)
Hufton AL.
europepmc   +1 more source

The quest for an unbiased scientific impact indicator remains open. [PDF]

open access: yesProc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Vaccario G, Xu S, Mariani MS, Medo M.
europepmc   +1 more source

Little scientometrics, big scientometrics ... and beyond

Scientometrics, 1994
Although the field of scientometrics/bibliometrics is rapidly growing, and the interest in scientometric indicators is constantly rising, the field is in a crisis: subfields are drifting apart, the field is lacking consensus in basic questions and of internal communication, the quality of scientometric research is questioned by other disciplines. Among
W. Glänzel, U. Schoepflin
  +9 more sources

Scientometrics of the international journal Scientometrics

Scientometrics, 2003
An analysis of 1317 papers published in first fifty volumes during 1978 to 2001 of the international journal Scientometrics indicates the heterogeneity of the field with emphasis on scientometric assessment. The study indicates that the US share of papers is constantly on the decline while that of the Netherlands, India, France and Japan is on the rise.
Dutt Bharvi, K. C. Garg, Anita Bali
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy