Results 11 to 20 of about 139,082 (203)

Protocol of a collaborative evaluation systematized non-systematic reviews by “DESCreview”, a Design tool for Evaluating risk of bias/quality in Systematized and sCoping reviews [PDF]

Archives of Public Health
Background . Reproducible reviews that have a systematized approach, such as scoping, mapping, rapid, and other non-systematic reviews (henceforth, referred to as Scoping et al.
Alexis Descatha, Aurélie Mayet, Grace Sembajwe, Marc Fadel   +3 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Enhancing research methods: The role of systematic and scoping reviews in orthopaedics, sports medicine and rehabilitation [PDF]

Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Efforts to improve research standards in orthopaedics, sports medicine, physical therapy, and rehabilitation are ongoing. Rrehabilitation andomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) are widely regarded as the gold standard for the collection of primary data ...
Robert Prill, Aleksandra Królikowska, M. Enes Kayaalp, Nikolai Ramadanov, Jon Karlsson, Michael T. Hirschmann   +5 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Scoping review

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Dysphonia significantly impacts communication and quality of life, and voice therapy is a common treatment. However, its effectiveness can be hindered by patient non-adherence. This project aims to review existing literature on factors influencing cooperation and adherence to voice therapy in dysphonia patients. A scoping review will be conducted using
Da Silva, Kelly, Soares, Maria Júlia Galindo, De Sousa Oliveira, Maria Helena, Almeida, Anna Alice   +3 more
  +9 more sources

How to write a scoping review?

International Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research, 2023
Scoping reviews have become a common form of evidence synthesis in the past few years. They can collect information from any research methodology as well as from research sources.
Pooja Sharma, Nishant Goyal
doaj   +1 more source

Evaluating the relationship between citation set size, team size and screening methods used in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study

BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2021
Background Standard practice for conducting systematic reviews (SRs) is time consuming and involves the study team screening hundreds or thousands of citations. As the volume of medical literature grows, the citation set sizes and corresponding screening
Katie O’Hearn, Cameron MacDonald, Anne Tsampalieros, Leo Kadota, Ryan Sandarage, Supun Kotteduwa Jayawarden, Michele Datko, John M. Reynolds, Thanh Bui, Shagufta Sultan, Margaret Sampson, Misty Pratt, Nick Barrowman, Nassr Nama, Matthew Page, James Dayre McNally   +15 more
doaj   +1 more source

The international platform of registered systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (INPLASY) at 3 years: an analysis of 4,658 registered protocols on inplasy.com, platform features, and website statistics

Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 2023
BackgroundINPLASY® is an international platform for registering systematic reviews and meta-analysis protocols that was launched in March 2020. INPLASY® provides an online database in which the protocols are maintained as permanent public records and can
João Vitor dos Santos Canellas, Fabio Gamboa Ritto, Alessandro Rodolico, Eugenio Aguglia, Gustavo Vicentis de Oliveira Fernandes, Carlos Marcelo da Silva Figueredo, Mario Vianna Vettore   +6 more
doaj   +1 more source

How to write a scoping review? – A comprehensive guide

Endodontology, 2023
Systematic reviews occupy a higher order of hierarchy in the evidence pyramid; however, certain questions are left unanswered since a quantitative synthesis is difficult to achieve when there is limited and heterogeneous data. The scoping reviews thereby
Alpa Gupta, Arundeep Singh, Kritika Aneja, Vivek Aggarwal, Jitesh Wadhwa, Dax Abraham   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

From Arksey and O’Malley and Beyond: Customizations to enhance a team-based, mixed approach to scoping review methodology

MethodsX, 2021
This article presents a method of conducting a scoping review that synthesizes recommendations from previous literature while contributing additional customizations to enhance a team-based, mixed method approach.
Kristi K Westphaln, Wendy Regoeczi, Marie Masotya, Bridget Vazquez-Westphaln, Kaitlin Lounsbury, Lolita McDavid, HaeNim Lee, Jennifer Johnson, Sarah D. Ronis   +8 more
doaj   +1 more source

Disaster eHealth: Scoping Review [PDF]

Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2020
Background Although both disaster management and disaster medicine have been used for decades, their efficiency and effectiveness have been far from perfect. One reason could be the lack of systematic utilization of modern technologies, such as eHealth, in their operations.
Samaneh Madanian, Tony Norris, Dave Parry   +2 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2018
Background Scoping reviews are a relatively new approach to evidence synthesis and currently there exists little guidance regarding the decision to choose between a systematic review or scoping review approach when synthesising evidence.
Zachary Munn, Micah D. J. Peters, Cindy Stern, Catalin Tufanaru, Alexa McArthur, Edoardo Aromataris   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source