Results 251 to 260 of about 117,072 (302)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Biotoxicology of sea snake venoms
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 1987Sea snakes are the most abundant venomous reptiles, found throughout the Indian and Pacific Oceans. Divided into two subfamilies, Laticaudinae and Hydrophiinae, all sea snakes are poisonous. Venoms are highly toxic, as indicated by low LD50 values in test animals. Toxic compounds include presynaptic and postsynaptic neurotoxins.
openaire +2 more sources
ENVENOMATION BY SEA SNAKE IN QUEENSLAND
Medical Journal of Australia, 1981A case of a near-fatal sea snake bite, believed to the the first such case in Australia, is presented. The two-year-old girl victim became unconscious and apnoeic soon after envenomation by an Astrotia stokesii, and required artificial ventilation for 22 hours. She regained consciousness 4 1/2 hours after the administration of antivenom.
H P, Mercer, J J, McGill, R A, Ibrahim
openaire +2 more sources
Toxicon, 1974
Abstract In vitro cross-neutralization of venoms of nine species of sea snake was studied, using mice and immunodiffusion patterns as indicators. Tiger snake antivenene was more effective than sea-snake antivenene against all species. Both antivenenes neutralized all venoms tested— Aipysurus laevis , Astrotia stokesii , Enhydrina schistosa ...
E H, Baxter, H A, Gallichio
openaire +2 more sources
Abstract In vitro cross-neutralization of venoms of nine species of sea snake was studied, using mice and immunodiffusion patterns as indicators. Tiger snake antivenene was more effective than sea-snake antivenene against all species. Both antivenenes neutralized all venoms tested— Aipysurus laevis , Astrotia stokesii , Enhydrina schistosa ...
E H, Baxter, H A, Gallichio
openaire +2 more sources
Nature, 1930
MR. SMEDLEY'S note on viviparity in the sea-snake (Laticauda colubrina) in NATURE of Aug. 30, p. 312, needs some comment. My statement (which he quotes) that all sea-snakes are viviparous was not a reiteration of that of previous authors, but a confirmation, based upon personal knowledge of the group.
openaire +1 more source
MR. SMEDLEY'S note on viviparity in the sea-snake (Laticauda colubrina) in NATURE of Aug. 30, p. 312, needs some comment. My statement (which he quotes) that all sea-snakes are viviparous was not a reiteration of that of previous authors, but a confirmation, based upon personal knowledge of the group.
openaire +1 more source
Nature, 1931
IN a communication on this subject in NATURE of Oct. 11, 1930, p. 568, Dr. Smith discusses my note on Laticauda colubrina. I am quite aware that Dr. Smith's statement that all sea-snakes are viviparous was something more than a mere reiteration, but I consider that both he and previous authors have generalised from insufficient data.
openaire +1 more source
IN a communication on this subject in NATURE of Oct. 11, 1930, p. 568, Dr. Smith discusses my note on Laticauda colubrina. I am quite aware that Dr. Smith's statement that all sea-snakes are viviparous was something more than a mere reiteration, but I consider that both he and previous authors have generalised from insufficient data.
openaire +1 more source
The chemistry of snake venom and its medicinal potential
Nature Reviews Chemistry, 2022Ana Oliveira +2 more
exaly