Results 71 to 80 of about 62,792 (208)
Moral Skepticism and the Benacerraf Challenge [Elektronisk resurs]
, 2017 The Benacerraf challenge is a well-known objection to Platonism in mathematics. Its proponent argues that, if mathematical entities are, as Platonists claim, mind-independent, causally inert, and existent beyond space and time, then we are led to a ...
Tersman, Folke,
core
, 2010 I develop a framework that elucidates how the primary target of auditors’ professional skepticism – audit evidence or their own judgment and decision making – interacts with other factors to affect auditors’ professional judgments. As an initial test of
Grenier, Jonathan H.
core
Identifying the Actual Impact of Online Social Interactions on Demand
Asia Marketing JournalFirms often engage in manipulating online reviews as a promotional activity to influence consumers' evaluation on their products. With the prevalence of the promotional activities, consumers may notice and discount the reviews generated by the ...
Dong Soo Kim
doaj +1 more source
Studia Gilsoniana, 2016 The article aims at uncovering reasons why philosophy may become conducive to dogmatism which inevitably leads to the failure of philosophy. In the light of Gilson’s considerations contained in his The Unity of Philosophical Experience, the author ...
Michael Nnamdi Konye
doaj
Moral Skepticism and the Benacerraf Challenge
, 2017 The Benacerraf challenge is a well-known objection to Platonism in mathematics. Its proponent argues that, if mathematical entities are, as Platonists claim, mind-independent, causally inert, and existent beyond space and time, then we are led to a ...
Tersman, Folke
core
Visitado el 2 de marzo de 2012Sumario: 1. Academic vs. Pyrrhonian Skepticism -- 2. Academic Skepticism -- a. Arcesilaus -- i. Platonic Innovator -- ii. Attack on the Stoics -- iii. On Suspending Judgment -- iv.
Thorsrud, Harald
core
, 2018 Fogelin’s neo-Pyrrhonism is skepticism about epistemology and philosophy more generally. Philosophical reflection on ordinary epistemic practices leads us to deny the possibility of knowledge and justified belief.
Lammenranta, Markus
core
, 2007 Many contemporary philosophers believe that skeptical arguments are important as they reveal flaws in our reasoning, the removal of which helps us to fine tune 'good' epistemology.
Fitzpatrick, Kevin
core
Descartes and content skepticism
, 2013 Obtaining clarity on what, if anything, is new in Descartes’ use of skeptical arguments is an important exercise both for revealing the nature and scope of his skepticism and for revealing something about his historical relationship to the ancient ...
Brown, Deborah, Deborah Brown
core +1 more source