Results 1 to 10 of about 6,614,138 (295)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
A survey of multi-source domain adaptation
Information Fusion, 2015Theoretical developments on multi-source domain adaptation are reviewed.Well developed algorithms on multi-source domain adaptation are reviewed and categorized.Performance measurements and benchmark data for multi-source domain adaptation are summarized.Interesting open problems that can be explored in future are discussed.
Shiliang Sun
exaly +2 more sources
Diffusion Process for the Domain-Source
Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics, 2023zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +2 more sources
Domain Adaptation in the Absence of Source Domain Data
Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016The overwhelming majority of existing domain adaptation methods makes an assumption of freely available source domain data. An equal access to both source and target data makes it possible to measure the discrepancy between their distributions and to build representations common to both target and source domains.
Boris Chidlovskii +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Imbalanced Source-free Domain Adaptation
Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2021Conventional Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA) aims to transfer knowledge from a well-labeled source domain to an unlabeled target domain only when data from both domains is simultaneously accessible, which is challenged by the recent Source-free Domain Adaptation (SFDA).
Xinhao Li 0002 +4 more
openaire +3 more sources
Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 2011
Two fundamental problems remain unsolved: “what counts as experiential basis, [or] … what the typology of experiential bases might be” (Grady, Taub & Morgan, 1996), and the concrete-abstract distinction (Gibbs, 1996). The paper distinguishes between concrete entities as material, and abstract as non-material.
openaire +1 more source
Two fundamental problems remain unsolved: “what counts as experiential basis, [or] … what the typology of experiential bases might be” (Grady, Taub & Morgan, 1996), and the concrete-abstract distinction (Gibbs, 1996). The paper distinguishes between concrete entities as material, and abstract as non-material.
openaire +1 more source